rap: is bad influence

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents style
Weight: 0.61
, thing
Weight: 0.57
, form
Weight: 0.54
, influence
Weight: 0.53
, music
Weight: 0.51
Siblings rap music
Weight: 0.37
, rock music
Weight: 0.34
, punk rock
Weight: 0.34
, pop music
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is bad influence 1.00
has quality influence 0.91
influence people to tag 0.80
is bad now 0.77
have negative impact on youth 0.76
have negative impact 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(rap, is bad influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(rap music, is bad influence)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(rap, is bad influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(pop music, is bad now)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(rap, is bad influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(rap music, have negative impact on youth)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(rap, is bad influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(rap music, has quality influence)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(rap, is bad influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(rap music, have negative impact)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(rap, is bad influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(rap music, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(rap music, has quality influence)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(rap, is bad influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(rap music, is bad influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(rap music, is bad influence)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(rap, is bad influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(pop music, is bad now) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(pop music, is bad now)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(rap, is bad influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(rap music, have negative impact) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(rap music, have negative impact)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(rap, is bad influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(rap music, have negative impact on youth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(rap music, have negative impact on youth)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(rap, is bad influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(rap, is bad influence)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(rap, is bad influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(rap, has quality influence)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(rap, is bad influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(rap, has quality influence)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(rap, is bad influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(rap, have negative impact)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(rap, is bad influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(rap, is bad now)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(rap, is bad influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(rap, is bad now)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(rap, is bad influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(rap, influence people to tag)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(rap, is bad influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(rap, influence people to tag)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(rap, is bad influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(rap, have negative impact)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(rap, is bad influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(rap, is bad now)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(rap, is bad influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(rap, is bad now)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(rap, is bad influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(rap, has quality influence)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(rap, is bad influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(rap, influence people to tag)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(rap, is bad influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(rap, have negative impact on youth)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(rap, is bad influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(rap, have negative impact on youth)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(rap, is bad influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(rap, have negative impact)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(rap, is bad influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(rap, have negative impact on youth)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(rap, is bad influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(rap, have negative impact on youth)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(rap, is bad influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(rap, influence people to tag)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(rap, is bad influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(rap, have negative impact)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(rap, is bad influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(rap, has quality influence)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(rap, is bad influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(rap, is bad influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(rap, is bad influence)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(rap, is bad influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(rap, is bad influence)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(rap, is bad influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(rap music, has quality influence)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(rap, is bad influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(pop music, is bad now)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(rap, is bad influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(rap music, is bad influence)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(rap, is bad influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(rap music, have negative impact)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(rap, is bad influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(rap music, have negative impact on youth)