rat: be at laboratory

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.70
, rodent
Weight: 0.65
, animal
Weight: 0.65
, wild animal
Weight: 0.64
Siblings kangaroo rat
Weight: 0.56
, cockroach
Weight: 0.37
, rabbit
Weight: 0.37
, lizard
Weight: 0.37
, monkey
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at laboratory 1.00
be at research laboratory 0.94
be used to laboratory experiment 0.90
die in laboratory 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(rat, be at laboratory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(lizard, be at laboratory)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(rat, be at laboratory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at research laboratory)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(rat, be at laboratory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at laboratory)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(rat, be at laboratory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(monkey, be at laboratory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(monkey, be at laboratory)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(rat, be at laboratory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(lizard, be at laboratory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(lizard, be at laboratory)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(rat, be at laboratory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(monkey, be at research laboratory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(monkey, be at research laboratory)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(rat, be at laboratory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(rat, be at laboratory)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(rat, be at laboratory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(rat, be used to laboratory experiment)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(rat, be at laboratory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(rat, be used to laboratory experiment)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(rat, be at laboratory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(rat, be used to laboratory experiment)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(rat, be at laboratory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(rat, be used to laboratory experiment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(rat, be at laboratory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(rat, be at laboratory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(rat, be at laboratory)

Typical implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(rat, be at laboratory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(rat, be at laboratory)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(rat, be at laboratory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(monkey, be at laboratory)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(rat, be at laboratory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(lizard, be at laboratory)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(rat, be at laboratory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(monkey, be at research laboratory)