rat: be called rats

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.70
, rodent
Weight: 0.65
, animal
Weight: 0.65
Siblings kangaroo rat
Weight: 0.56
, cockroach
Weight: 0.37
, rabbit
Weight: 0.37
, lizard
Weight: 0.37
, monkey
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be called rats 1.00
be different to rats 0.96
eat rats 0.95
be different to normal rats 0.90
be called rodents 0.90
differ from rats 0.89
jump back on rats 0.88
differ from black rats 0.87
jump back on other rats 0.87
kill mice 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(rat, be called rats)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(rat, be called rats)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(rat, be called rats)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(rat, eat rats)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(rat, be called rats)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(rat, differ from rats)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(rat, be called rats)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(rat, eat rats)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(rat, be called rats)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(rat, eat rats)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(rat, be called rats)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(rat, be different to rats)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(rat, be called rats)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(rat, eat rats)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(rat, be called rats)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(rat, be different to rats)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(rat, be called rats)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(rat, be called rodents)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(rat, be called rats)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(rat, differ from rats)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(rat, be called rats)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(rat, be different to rats)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(rat, be called rats)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(rat, jump back on rats)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(rat, be called rats)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(rat, differ from rats)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(rat, be called rats)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(rat, be called rodents)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(rat, be called rats)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(rat, be called rodents)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(rat, be called rats)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(rat, jump back on rats)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(rat, be called rats)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(rat, jump back on rats)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(rat, be called rats)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(rat, kill mice)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(rat, be called rats)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(rat, jump back on rats)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(rat, be called rats)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(rat, be different to rats)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(rat, be called rats)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(rat, kill mice)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(rat, be called rats)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(rat, kill mice)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(rat, be called rats)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(rat, kill mice)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(rat, be called rats)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(rat, be called rodents)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(rat, be called rats)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(rat, differ from rats)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(rat, be called rats)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(rat, be called rats)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(rat, be called rats)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(rat, be called rats)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(rat, be called rats)