rat: be called rodents

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.70
, rodent
Weight: 0.65
, animal
Weight: 0.65
Siblings kangaroo rat
Weight: 0.56
, cockroach
Weight: 0.37
, rabbit
Weight: 0.37
, lizard
Weight: 0.37
, monkey
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be called rodents 1.00
be considered rodents 0.98
be called rats 0.90
eat rats 0.87
be different to rats 0.87
be different to normal rats 0.83
kill mice 0.82
differ from rats 0.81
be like more squirrels than fish 0.81
jump back on rats 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(rat, be called rodents)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(rat, be called rodents)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(rat, be called rodents)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(rat, be considered rodents)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(rat, be called rodents)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(rat, eat rats)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(rat, be called rodents)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(rat, be called rats)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(rat, be called rodents)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(rat, eat rats)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(rat, be called rodents)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(rat, be considered rodents)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(rat, be called rodents)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(rat, be different to rats)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(rat, be called rodents)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(rat, kill mice)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(rat, be called rodents)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(rat, jump back on rats)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(rat, be called rodents)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(rat, be called rats)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(rat, be called rodents)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(rat, differ from rats)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(rat, be called rodents)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(rat, be different to rats)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(rat, be called rodents)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(rat, differ from rats)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(rat, be called rodents)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(rat, jump back on rats)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(rat, be called rodents)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(rat, eat rats)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(rat, be called rodents)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(rat, differ from rats)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(rat, be called rodents)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(rat, kill mice)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(rat, be called rodents)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(rat, differ from rats)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(rat, be called rodents)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(rat, be considered rodents)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(rat, be called rodents)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(rat, be called rats)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(rat, be called rodents)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(rat, be considered rodents)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(rat, be called rodents)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(rat, jump back on rats)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(rat, be called rodents)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(rat, eat rats)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(rat, be called rodents)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(rat, be different to rats)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(rat, be called rodents)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(rat, kill mice)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(rat, be called rodents)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(rat, be called rats)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(rat, be called rodents)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(rat, be different to rats)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(rat, be called rodents)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(rat, jump back on rats)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(rat, be called rodents)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(rat, kill mice)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(rat, be called rodents)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(rat, be called rodents)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(rat, be called rodents)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(rat, be called rodents)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(rat, be called rodents)