rat: be considered rodents

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.70
, rodent
Weight: 0.65
, animal
Weight: 0.65
Siblings kangaroo rat
Weight: 0.56
, cockroach
Weight: 0.37
, rabbit
Weight: 0.37
, lizard
Weight: 0.37
, monkey
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered rodents 1.00
be called rodents 0.98
be called rats 0.86
be different to rats 0.85
eat rats 0.85
be different to normal rats 0.81
be like more squirrels than fish 0.81
differ from rats 0.81
differ from black rats 0.80
kill mice 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(rat, be considered rodents)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(rat, be considered rodents)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(rat, be considered rodents)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(rat, be called rodents)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(rat, be considered rodents)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(rat, be called rodents)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(rat, be considered rodents)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(rat, be called rodents)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(rat, be considered rodents)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(rat, eat rats)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(rat, be considered rodents)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(rat, be called rodents)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(rat, be considered rodents)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(rat, be called rats)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(rat, be considered rodents)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(rat, be different to rats)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(rat, be considered rodents)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(rat, eat rats)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(rat, be considered rodents)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(rat, eat rats)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(rat, be considered rodents)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(rat, differ from rats)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(rat, be considered rodents)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(rat, differ from rats)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(rat, be considered rodents)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(rat, be called rats)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(rat, be considered rodents)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(rat, kill mice)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(rat, be considered rodents)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(rat, differ from rats)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(rat, be considered rodents)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(rat, be different to rats)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(rat, be considered rodents)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(rat, eat rats)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(rat, be considered rodents)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(rat, be called rats)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(rat, be considered rodents)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(rat, kill mice)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(rat, be considered rodents)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(rat, be different to rats)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(rat, be considered rodents)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(rat, be called rats)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(rat, be considered rodents)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(rat, be different to rats)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(rat, be considered rodents)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(rat, kill mice)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(rat, be considered rodents)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(rat, differ from rats)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(rat, be considered rodents)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(rat, kill mice)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(rat, be considered rodents)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(rat, be considered rodents)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(rat, be considered rodents)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(rat, be considered rodents)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(rat, be considered rodents)