rat: be harmful

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.70
, rodent
Weight: 0.65
, animal
Weight: 0.65
Siblings kangaroo rat
Weight: 0.56
, cockroach
Weight: 0.37
, rabbit
Weight: 0.37
, lizard
Weight: 0.37
, monkey
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be harmful 1.00
is harmful 0.99
be harmful to people 0.95
is dangerous 0.78
be destructive 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(rat, be harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(cockroach, be harmful to people)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(rat, be harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(lizard, is dangerous)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(rat, be harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(cockroach, be harmful)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(rat, be harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(cockroach, be harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(cockroach, be harmful)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(rat, be harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(cockroach, be harmful to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(cockroach, be harmful to people)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(rat, be harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(lizard, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(lizard, is dangerous)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(rat, be harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(rat, be harmful)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(rat, be harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(rat, is harmful)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(rat, be harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(rat, is harmful)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(rat, be harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(rat, is harmful)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(rat, be harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(rat, is harmful)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(rat, be harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(rat, is dangerous)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(rat, be harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(rat, be destructive)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(rat, be harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(rat, is dangerous)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(rat, be harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(rat, is dangerous)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(rat, be harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(rat, be destructive)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(rat, be harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(rat, is dangerous)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(rat, be harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(rat, be destructive)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(rat, be harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(rat, be destructive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(rat, be harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(rat, be harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(rat, be harmful)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(rat, be harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(rat, be harmful)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(rat, be harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(cockroach, be harmful)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(rat, be harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(cockroach, be harmful to people)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(rat, be harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(lizard, is dangerous)