rat: has physical part caecum

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.70
, rodent
Weight: 0.65
, animal
Weight: 0.65
Siblings kangaroo rat
Weight: 0.56
, cockroach
Weight: 0.37
, rabbit
Weight: 0.37
, lizard
Weight: 0.37
, monkey
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part caecum 1.00
has physical part vibrissae 0.89
has physical part systems 0.87
has physical part eyes 0.87
has physical part teeth 0.86
has physical part hair 0.86
has physical part feet 0.84
has physical part ears 0.83
has physical part balls 0.82
has physical part tails 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(rat, has physical part caecum)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(rat, has physical part caecum)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(rodent, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(rat, has physical part caecum)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(rodent, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(rat, has physical part caecum)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(rodent, has physical part teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(rat, has physical part caecum)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(rodent, has physical part balls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(rat, has physical part caecum)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(rat, has physical part caecum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(rodent, has physical part teeth)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(rat, has physical part caecum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(rodent, has physical part balls)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(rat, has physical part caecum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(rodent, has physical part eyes)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(rat, has physical part caecum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(rodent, has physical part tails)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(rat, has physical part caecum) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, has physical part eyes)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(rat, has physical part caecum) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, has physical part tails)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(rat, has physical part caecum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(rodent, has physical part balls)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(rat, has physical part caecum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(rodent, has physical part tails)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(rat, has physical part caecum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(rodent, has physical part teeth)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(rat, has physical part caecum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(rodent, has physical part eyes)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(rat, has physical part caecum) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, has physical part eyes)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(rat, has physical part caecum) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, has physical part tails)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(rat, has physical part caecum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(kangaroo rat, has physical part ears)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(rat, has physical part caecum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(lizard, has physical part tails)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(rat, has physical part caecum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, has physical part ears)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(rat, has physical part caecum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(monkey, has physical part tails)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(rat, has physical part caecum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(kangaroo rat, has physical part eyes)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(rat, has physical part caecum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, has physical part tails)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(rat, has physical part caecum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(kangaroo rat, has physical part tails)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(rat, has physical part caecum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(rat, has physical part caecum)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(rat, has physical part caecum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(rat, has physical part caecum)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(rodent, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(rat, has physical part caecum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(rat, has physical part caecum)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(rodent, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(rat, has physical part caecum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(rat, has physical part caecum)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(rodent, has physical part teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(rat, has physical part caecum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(rat, has physical part caecum)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(rodent, has physical part balls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(rat, has physical part caecum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(rat, has physical part caecum)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(rat, has physical part caecum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(kangaroo rat, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(kangaroo rat, has physical part eyes)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(rat, has physical part caecum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(kangaroo rat, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(kangaroo rat, has physical part ears)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(rat, has physical part caecum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(rabbit, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(rabbit, has physical part ears)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(rat, has physical part caecum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(lizard, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(lizard, has physical part tails)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(rat, has physical part caecum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(monkey, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(monkey, has physical part tails)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(rat, has physical part caecum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(rabbit, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(rabbit, has physical part tails)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(rat, has physical part caecum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(kangaroo rat, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(kangaroo rat, has physical part tails)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(rat, has physical part caecum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(rat, has physical part caecum)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(rat, has physical part caecum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(rat, has physical part tails)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(rat, has physical part caecum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(rat, has physical part tails)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(rat, has physical part caecum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(rat, has physical part tails)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(rat, has physical part caecum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(rat, has physical part tails)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(rat, has physical part caecum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(rat, has physical part caecum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(rat, has physical part caecum)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(rat, has physical part caecum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(rat, has physical part caecum)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(rat, has physical part caecum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(rodent, has physical part teeth)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(rat, has physical part caecum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(rodent, has physical part eyes)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(rat, has physical part caecum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(rodent, has physical part balls)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(rat, has physical part caecum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(rodent, has physical part tails)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(rat, has physical part caecum) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part eyes)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(rat, has physical part caecum) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part tails)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(rat, has physical part caecum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(kangaroo rat, has physical part ears)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(rat, has physical part caecum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(rabbit, has physical part ears)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(rat, has physical part caecum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(lizard, has physical part tails)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(rat, has physical part caecum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(monkey, has physical part tails)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(rat, has physical part caecum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(kangaroo rat, has physical part eyes)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(rat, has physical part caecum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(kangaroo rat, has physical part tails)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(rat, has physical part caecum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(rabbit, has physical part tails)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(rat, has physical part caecum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(rodent, has physical part teeth)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(rat, has physical part caecum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(rodent, has physical part eyes)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(rat, has physical part caecum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(rodent, has physical part balls)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(rat, has physical part caecum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(rodent, has physical part tails)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(rat, has physical part caecum) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part eyes)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(rat, has physical part caecum) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part tails)