ratio: be called golden

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.62
, variable
Weight: 0.60
, topic
Weight: 0.58
, parameter
Weight: 0.58
Siblings golden ratio
Weight: 0.72
, roe
Weight: 0.52
, peg
Weight: 0.45
, interest rate
Weight: 0.34
, rate
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be called golden 1.00
is golden 0.98

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(ratio, be called golden)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(golden ratio, be called golden)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(ratio, be called golden)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(golden ratio, is golden)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(ratio, be called golden)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(golden ratio, be called golden)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(golden ratio, be called golden)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(ratio, be called golden)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(golden ratio, is golden)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(golden ratio, is golden)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(ratio, be called golden)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(ratio, be called golden)

Similarity expansion

0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(ratio, be called golden)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(ratio, is golden)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(ratio, be called golden)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(ratio, is golden)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(ratio, be called golden)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(ratio, is golden)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(ratio, be called golden)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(ratio, is golden)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(ratio, be called golden)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(ratio, be called golden)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(ratio, be called golden)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(ratio, be called golden)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(ratio, be called golden)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(ratio, be called golden)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(golden ratio, be called golden)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(ratio, be called golden)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(golden ratio, is golden)