ratio: be different for equivalent fractions

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.62
, variable
Weight: 0.60
, topic
Weight: 0.58
, parameter
Weight: 0.58
Siblings golden ratio
Weight: 0.72
, roe
Weight: 0.52
, peg
Weight: 0.45
, interest rate
Weight: 0.34
, rate
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be different for equivalent fractions 1.00
be like equivalent fractions 0.99
be different for fractions 0.94
be like fractions 0.92
is fractions 0.91
be written as fractions 0.89
has mass equivalent 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(ratio, be different for equivalent fractions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(ratio, be different for equivalent fractions)

Similarity expansion

0.84
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(ratio, be different for equivalent fractions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(ratio, be like equivalent fractions)
0.84
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(ratio, be different for equivalent fractions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(ratio, be like equivalent fractions)
0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(ratio, be different for equivalent fractions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(ratio, be like equivalent fractions)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(ratio, be different for equivalent fractions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(ratio, be like fractions)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(ratio, be different for equivalent fractions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(ratio, be like fractions)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(ratio, be different for equivalent fractions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(ratio, be like fractions)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(ratio, be different for equivalent fractions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(ratio, is fractions)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(ratio, be different for equivalent fractions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(ratio, is fractions)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(ratio, be different for equivalent fractions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(ratio, is fractions)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(ratio, be different for equivalent fractions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(ratio, be written as fractions)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(ratio, be different for equivalent fractions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(ratio, be written as fractions)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(ratio, be different for equivalent fractions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(ratio, be written as fractions)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(ratio, be different for equivalent fractions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(ratio, has mass equivalent)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(ratio, be different for equivalent fractions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(ratio, has mass equivalent)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(ratio, be different for equivalent fractions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(ratio, has mass equivalent)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(ratio, be different for equivalent fractions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(ratio, be written as fractions)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(ratio, be different for equivalent fractions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(ratio, be like equivalent fractions)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(ratio, be different for equivalent fractions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(ratio, be like fractions)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(ratio, be different for equivalent fractions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(ratio, is fractions)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(ratio, be different for equivalent fractions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(ratio, has mass equivalent)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(ratio, be different for equivalent fractions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(ratio, be different for equivalent fractions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(ratio, be different for equivalent fractions)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(ratio, be different for equivalent fractions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(ratio, be different for equivalent fractions)