ratio: be important in design

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.62
, variable
Weight: 0.60
, topic
Weight: 0.58
, parameter
Weight: 0.58
Siblings golden ratio
Weight: 0.72
, roe
Weight: 0.52
, peg
Weight: 0.45
, interest rate
Weight: 0.34
, rate
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in design 1.00
be used in architecture 0.82
be important in kicthen 0.77
be important in art 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(ratio, be important in design)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(golden ratio, be important in design)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(ratio, be important in design)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(golden ratio, be important in art)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(ratio, be important in design)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(golden ratio, be used in architecture)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(ratio, be important in design)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(golden ratio, be important in design)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(golden ratio, be important in design)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(ratio, be important in design)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(golden ratio, be used in architecture)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(golden ratio, be used in architecture)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(ratio, be important in design)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(golden ratio, be important in art)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(golden ratio, be important in art)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(ratio, be important in design)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(ratio, be important in design)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(ratio, be important in design)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(ratio, be used in architecture)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(ratio, be important in design)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(ratio, be used in architecture)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(ratio, be important in design)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(ratio, be used in architecture)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(ratio, be important in design)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(ratio, be important in kicthen)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(ratio, be important in design)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(ratio, be important in art)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(ratio, be important in design)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(ratio, be important in kicthen)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(ratio, be important in design)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(ratio, be important in art)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(ratio, be important in design)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(ratio, be important in kicthen)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(ratio, be important in design)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(ratio, be important in art)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(ratio, be important in design)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(ratio, be used in architecture)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(ratio, be important in design)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(ratio, be important in art)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(ratio, be important in design)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(ratio, be important in kicthen)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(ratio, be important in design)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(ratio, be important in design)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(ratio, be important in design)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(ratio, be important in design)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(ratio, be important in design)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(ratio, be important in design)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(golden ratio, be used in architecture)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(ratio, be important in design)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(golden ratio, be important in design)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(ratio, be important in design)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(golden ratio, be important in art)