ratio: be related to chemical equations

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.62
, variable
Weight: 0.60
, topic
Weight: 0.58
, parameter
Weight: 0.58
Siblings golden ratio
Weight: 0.72
, roe
Weight: 0.52
, peg
Weight: 0.45
, interest rate
Weight: 0.34
, rate
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be related to chemical equations 1.00
be related to equations 0.95
be in equations 0.92
be in formulas 0.76
dissolving similar to rates of chemical 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.18
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(variable, be in equations)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(ratio, be related to chemical equations)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(factor, be in formulas)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(ratio, be related to chemical equations)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(ratio, be related to chemical equations)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(variable, be in equations)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(ratio, be related to chemical equations)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(factor, be in formulas)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(ratio, be related to chemical equations)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(factor, be in formulas)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(ratio, be related to chemical equations)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(variable, be in equations)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(ratio, be related to chemical equations)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(rate, dissolving similar to rates of chemical)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(variable, be in equations)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(ratio, be related to chemical equations)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(ratio, be related to chemical equations)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(factor, be in formulas)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(ratio, be related to chemical equations)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(ratio, be related to chemical equations)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(ratio, be related to chemical equations)
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(rate, dissolving similar to rates of chemical)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(rate, dissolving similar to rates of chemical)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(ratio, be related to chemical equations)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(ratio, be related to chemical equations)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(ratio, be related to chemical equations)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(ratio, be related to chemical equations)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(ratio, be related to chemical equations)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(ratio, be related to chemical equations)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(ratio, be related to chemical equations)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(ratio, be related to chemical equations)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(variable, be in equations)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(ratio, be related to chemical equations)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(factor, be in formulas)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(ratio, be related to chemical equations)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(rate, dissolving similar to rates of chemical)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(ratio, be related to chemical equations)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(variable, be in equations)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(ratio, be related to chemical equations)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(factor, be in formulas)