ratio: has mass equivalent

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.62
, variable
Weight: 0.60
, topic
Weight: 0.58
, parameter
Weight: 0.58
Siblings golden ratio
Weight: 0.72
, roe
Weight: 0.52
, peg
Weight: 0.45
, interest rate
Weight: 0.34
, rate
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has mass equivalent 1.00
be affected by mass 0.79
be different for equivalent fractions 0.76
be like equivalent fractions 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(ratio, has mass equivalent)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(rate, be affected by mass)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(ratio, has mass equivalent)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(rate, be affected by mass)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(rate, be affected by mass)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(ratio, has mass equivalent)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(ratio, has mass equivalent)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(ratio, has mass equivalent)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(ratio, be different for equivalent fractions)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(ratio, has mass equivalent)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(ratio, be like equivalent fractions)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(ratio, has mass equivalent)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(ratio, be different for equivalent fractions)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(ratio, has mass equivalent)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(ratio, be like equivalent fractions)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(ratio, has mass equivalent)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(ratio, be like equivalent fractions)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(ratio, has mass equivalent)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(ratio, be different for equivalent fractions)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(ratio, has mass equivalent)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(ratio, be like equivalent fractions)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(ratio, has mass equivalent)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(ratio, be different for equivalent fractions)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(ratio, has mass equivalent)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(ratio, has mass equivalent)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(ratio, has mass equivalent)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(ratio, has mass equivalent)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(ratio, has mass equivalent)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(ratio, has mass equivalent)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(rate, be affected by mass)