ratio: were important in mendels

Related concepts

Parents	factor Weight: 0.62 , variable Weight: 0.60 , topic Weight: 0.58 , parameter Weight: 0.58
Siblings	golden ratio Weight: 0.72 , roe Weight: 0.52 , peg Weight: 0.45 , interest rate Weight: 0.34 , rate Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property	Similarity
were important in mendels	1.00
be important in kicthen	0.90
is decidendi important	0.86
be are affected	0.80
be important in life	0.79
be important for business	0.77
be important in business	0.77
being are raised	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(factor, be important in business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(ratio, were important in mendels)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.89

Plausible(ratio, were important in mendels) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Plausible(factor, be important in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(ratio, were important in mendels) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(factor, be important in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(ratio, were important in mendels) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(interest rate, being are raised)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(factor, be important in business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

Remarkable(ratio, were important in mendels) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Plausible(ratio, were important in mendels)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.89

Plausible(ratio, were important in mendels) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

Remarkable(interest rate, being are raised) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Plausible(interest rate, being are raised)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.89

Plausible(ratio, were important in mendels) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Salient(ratio, were important in mendels)

Similarity expansion

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.96

Salient(ratio, were important in mendels) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Salient(ratio, be important in kicthen)

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.93

Typical(ratio, were important in mendels) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Typical(ratio, be important in kicthen)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.89

Plausible(ratio, were important in mendels) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Plausible(ratio, be important in kicthen)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.96

Salient(ratio, were important in mendels) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Salient(ratio, is decidendi important)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.93

Typical(ratio, were important in mendels) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Typical(ratio, is decidendi important)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.89

Plausible(ratio, were important in mendels) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Plausible(ratio, is decidendi important)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.96

Salient(ratio, were important in mendels) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Salient(ratio, be important in life)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.93

Typical(ratio, were important in mendels) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Typical(ratio, be important in life)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.96

Salient(ratio, were important in mendels) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Salient(ratio, be important for business)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.93

Typical(ratio, were important in mendels) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Typical(ratio, be important for business)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.89

Plausible(ratio, were important in mendels) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Plausible(ratio, be important in life)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.89

Plausible(ratio, were important in mendels) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Plausible(ratio, be important for business)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.66

Remarkable(ratio, were important in mendels) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(ratio, is decidendi important)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.66

Remarkable(ratio, were important in mendels) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(ratio, be important in kicthen)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.66

Remarkable(ratio, were important in mendels) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Remarkable(ratio, be important in life)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.66

Remarkable(ratio, were important in mendels) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(ratio, be important for business)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.96

Salient(ratio, were important in mendels) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(ratio, were important in mendels) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(ratio, were important in mendels)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.89

Plausible(ratio, were important in mendels) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(ratio, were important in mendels)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.16

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(ratio, were important in mendels) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(factor, be important in business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(ratio, were important in mendels) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Typical(interest rate, being are raised)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.93

Typical(ratio, were important in mendels) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(factor, be important in business)