razor blade: have holes in them

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents blade
Weight: 0.74
, utensil
Weight: 0.70
, weapon
Weight: 0.70
, instrument
Weight: 0.69
Siblings razor
Weight: 0.39
, knife
Weight: 0.36
, pocket knife
Weight: 0.36
, wooden spoon
Weight: 0.36
, scissors
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
have holes in them 1.00
has physical part holes 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(blade, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(razor blade, have holes in them)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(razor blade, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(blade, have holes in them)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(razor blade, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(blade, have holes in them)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(razor blade, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(wooden spoon, has physical part holes)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(razor blade, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(knife, have holes in them)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(razor blade, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(wooden spoon, have holes in them)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(razor blade, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(knife, has physical part holes)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(razor blade, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(pocket knife, have holes in them)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(blade, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(razor blade, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(razor blade, have holes in them)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(razor blade, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(pocket knife, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(pocket knife, have holes in them)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(razor blade, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(knife, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(knife, have holes in them)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(razor blade, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(wooden spoon, has physical part holes)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(wooden spoon, has physical part holes)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(razor blade, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(wooden spoon, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(wooden spoon, have holes in them)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(razor blade, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(knife, has physical part holes)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(knife, has physical part holes)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(razor blade, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(razor blade, have holes in them)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(razor blade, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(razor blade, has physical part holes)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(razor blade, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(razor blade, has physical part holes)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(razor blade, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(razor blade, has physical part holes)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(razor blade, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(razor blade, has physical part holes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(razor blade, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(razor blade, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(razor blade, have holes in them)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(razor blade, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(razor blade, have holes in them)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(razor blade, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(blade, have holes in them)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(razor blade, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(pocket knife, have holes in them)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(razor blade, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(wooden spoon, has physical part holes)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(razor blade, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(knife, have holes in them)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(razor blade, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(wooden spoon, have holes in them)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(razor blade, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(knife, has physical part holes)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(razor blade, have holes in them)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(blade, have holes in them)