re: was most important of egyptian gods

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents character
Weight: 0.59
, factor
Weight: 0.56
, service
Weight: 0.56
, term
Weight: 0.56
, part
Weight: 0.56
Siblings cycle
Weight: 0.31
, back
Weight: 0.30
, postal service
Weight: 0.30
, free will
Weight: 0.30
, fresh
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
was most important of egyptian gods 1.00
was most important of gods 0.95
was most important god 0.90
was important god 0.88
was god 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(re, was most important of egyptian gods)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(re, was most important of egyptian gods)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(re, was most important of egyptian gods)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(re, was most important of gods)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(re, was most important of egyptian gods)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(re, was most important of gods)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(re, was most important of egyptian gods)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(re, was god)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(re, was most important of egyptian gods)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(re, was most important god)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(re, was most important of egyptian gods)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(re, was important god)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(re, was most important of egyptian gods)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(re, was most important god)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(re, was most important of egyptian gods)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(re, was important god)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(re, was most important of egyptian gods)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(re, was most important of gods)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(re, was most important of egyptian gods)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(re, was god)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(re, was most important of egyptian gods)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(re, was god)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(re, was most important of egyptian gods)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(re, was god)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(re, was most important of egyptian gods)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(re, was most important of gods)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(re, was most important of egyptian gods)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(re, was most important god)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(re, was most important of egyptian gods)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(re, was important god)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(re, was most important of egyptian gods)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(re, was most important god)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(re, was most important of egyptian gods)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(re, was important god)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(re, was most important of egyptian gods)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(re, was most important of egyptian gods)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(re, was most important of egyptian gods)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(re, was most important of egyptian gods)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(re, was most important of egyptian gods)