reach advantage: requires change one position

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents -
Siblings -

Related properties

Property Similarity
requires change one position 1.00
be motivated by be in good position 0.86
causes good negotiate position 0.80
requires think about situation 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(reach advantage, requires change one position) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(reach advantage, requires change one position)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(reach advantage, requires change one position) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(reach advantage, be motivated by be in good position)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(reach advantage, requires change one position) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(reach advantage, be motivated by be in good position)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(reach advantage, requires change one position) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(reach advantage, be motivated by be in good position)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(reach advantage, requires change one position) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(reach advantage, causes good negotiate position)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(reach advantage, requires change one position) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(reach advantage, requires think about situation)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(reach advantage, requires change one position) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(reach advantage, causes good negotiate position)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(reach advantage, requires change one position) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(reach advantage, be motivated by be in good position)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(reach advantage, requires change one position) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(reach advantage, causes good negotiate position)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(reach advantage, requires change one position) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(reach advantage, requires think about situation)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(reach advantage, requires change one position) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(reach advantage, causes good negotiate position)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(reach advantage, requires change one position) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(reach advantage, requires think about situation)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(reach advantage, requires change one position) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(reach advantage, requires think about situation)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(reach advantage, requires change one position) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(reach advantage, requires change one position) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(reach advantage, requires change one position)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(reach advantage, requires change one position) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(reach advantage, requires change one position)