read: be used to understand

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents feature
Weight: 0.58
, activity
Weight: 0.58
, subject
Weight: 0.58
, issue
Weight: 0.54
Siblings good book
Weight: 0.63
, book
Weight: 0.63
, sign language
Weight: 0.33
, write
Weight: 0.33
, english language
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used to understand 1.00
causes understand 0.95
be used to know 0.87
be used to explain 0.86
advance knowledge to understand 0.83
be used to understand from another person experience 0.83
causes know 0.83
be motivated by know 0.82
be motivated by you have something to communicate 0.82
be motivated by want to learn something 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(read, be used to understand)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(write, be motivated by you have something to communicate)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(read, be used to understand)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(write, be motivated by you have something to communicate)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(write, be motivated by you have something to communicate)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(read, be used to understand)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(read, be used to understand)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(read, be used to understand)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(read, causes understand)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(read, be used to understand)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(read, causes understand)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(read, be used to understand)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(read, causes understand)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(read, be used to understand)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(read, causes understand)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(read, be used to understand)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(read, advance knowledge to understand)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(read, be used to understand)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(read, advance knowledge to understand)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(read, be used to understand)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(read, causes know)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(read, be used to understand)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(read, causes know)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(read, be used to understand)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(read, be motivated by know)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(read, be used to understand)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(read, be motivated by know)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(read, be used to understand)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(read, advance knowledge to understand)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(read, be used to understand)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(read, causes know)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(read, be used to understand)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(read, be motivated by know)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(read, be used to understand)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(read, causes know)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(read, be used to understand)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(read, be motivated by know)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(read, be used to understand)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(read, advance knowledge to understand)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(read, be used to understand)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(read, be used to understand)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(read, be used to understand)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(read, be used to understand)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(read, be used to understand)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(read, be used to understand)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(write, be motivated by you have something to communicate)