reader: continue his story

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents publication
Weight: 0.64
, electronic device
Weight: 0.61
, woman
Weight: 0.59
, journal
Weight: 0.59
Siblings editor
Weight: 0.65
, news article
Weight: 0.33
, phone book
Weight: 0.33
, newsweek
Weight: 0.33
, digital camera
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
continue his story 1.00
continue read 0.82
continue read book 0.81
word news story 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(reader, continue his story) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(editor, word news story)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(reader, continue his story) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(editor, word news story) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(editor, word news story)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(reader, continue his story) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(reader, continue his story)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(reader, continue his story) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(reader, continue read book)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(reader, continue his story) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(reader, continue read)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(reader, continue his story) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(reader, continue read)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(reader, continue his story) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(reader, continue read book)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(reader, continue his story) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(reader, continue read)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(reader, continue his story) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(reader, continue read book)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(reader, continue his story) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(reader, continue read)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(reader, continue his story) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(reader, continue read book)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(reader, continue his story) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(reader, continue his story) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(reader, continue his story)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(reader, continue his story) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(reader, continue his story)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(reader, continue his story) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(editor, word news story)