reader: feel in story

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents electronic device
Weight: 0.61
, woman
Weight: 0.59
, journal
Weight: 0.59
Siblings editor
Weight: 0.65
, news article
Weight: 0.33
, tablet computer
Weight: 0.33
, phone book
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
feel in story 1.00
read story 0.88
feel yelnat 0.80
building up tension in stories 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(reader, feel in story)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(reader, feel in story)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(reader, feel in story)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(reader, read story)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(reader, feel in story)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(reader, read story)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(reader, feel in story)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(reader, feel yelnat)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(reader, feel in story)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(reader, building up tension in stories)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(reader, feel in story)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(reader, read story)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(reader, feel in story)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(reader, feel yelnat)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(reader, feel in story)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(reader, read story)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(reader, feel in story)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(reader, feel yelnat)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(reader, feel in story)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(reader, building up tension in stories)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(reader, feel in story)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(reader, feel yelnat)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(reader, feel in story)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(reader, building up tension in stories)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(reader, feel in story)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(reader, building up tension in stories)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(reader, feel in story)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(reader, feel in story)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(reader, feel in story)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(reader, feel in story)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(reader, feel in story)