reading book: be better than television

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents book
Weight: 0.79
, activity
Weight: 0.65
, stuff
Weight: 0.60
, thing
Weight: 0.59
, assignment
Weight: 0.58
Siblings math book
Weight: 0.41
, phone book
Weight: 0.40
, read book
Weight: 0.39
, autobiography
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than television 1.00
be better watching before 0.79
be better watching 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(book, be better than television)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(reading book, be better than television)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(book, be better watching)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(reading book, be better than television)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(reading book, be better than television)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(book, be better than television)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(reading book, be better than television)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(book, be better watching)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(reading book, be better than television)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(book, be better than television)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(reading book, be better than television)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(book, be better watching)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(book, be better than television)
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(reading book, be better than television)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(reading book, be better than television)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(book, be better watching)
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(reading book, be better than television)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(reading book, be better than television)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(reading book, be better than television)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(reading book, be better than television)

Similarity expansion

0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(reading book, be better than television)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(reading book, be better watching)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(reading book, be better than television)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(reading book, be better watching)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(reading book, be better than television)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(reading book, be better watching before)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(reading book, be better than television)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(reading book, be better watching)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(reading book, be better than television)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(reading book, be better watching)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(reading book, be better than television)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(reading book, be better watching before)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(reading book, be better than television)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(reading book, be better watching before)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(reading book, be better than television)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(reading book, be better watching before)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(reading book, be better than television)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(reading book, be better than television)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(reading book, be better than television)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(reading book, be better than television)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(reading book, be better than television)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(reading book, be better than television)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(book, be better than television)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(reading book, be better than television)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(book, be better watching)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(reading book, be better than television)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(book, be better than television)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(reading book, be better than television)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(book, be better watching)