reading: have work

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents subject
Weight: 0.64
, sign
Weight: 0.64
, exercise
Weight: 0.64
, word
Weight: 0.61
Siblings read
Weight: 0.67
, good book
Weight: 0.64
, comprehension
Weight: 0.55
, math book
Weight: 0.49
, writing
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
have work 1.00
work 0.95
is work 0.94
seem work 0.85
is hard work 0.84
be much easier writing for some 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(sign, work)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(reading, have work)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(reading, have work)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(sign, work)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(reading, have work)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(sign, work)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(sign, work)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(reading, have work)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(reading, have work)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(reading, have work)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(reading, have work)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(reading, have work)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(reading, is work)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(reading, have work)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(reading, is work)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(reading, have work)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(reading, is work)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(reading, have work)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(reading, is work)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(reading, have work)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(reading, have work)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(reading, have work)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(reading, have work)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(reading, have work)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(reading, have work)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(sign, work)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(reading, have work)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(sign, work)