real estate: increase in value

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents real estate agent
Weight: 0.89
, course
Weight: 0.67
, enterprise
Weight: 0.67
, matter
Weight: 0.65
Siblings trust
Weight: 0.66
, appraisal
Weight: 0.65
, condo
Weight: 0.64
, school
Weight: 0.63
, condominium
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
increase in value 1.00
be used to reduce construction cost 0.75
be at high rise build 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(real estate, increase in value) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(condo, be at high rise build)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(real estate, increase in value) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(condo, be used to reduce construction cost)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(real estate, increase in value) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(condo, be at high rise build) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(condo, be at high rise build)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(real estate, increase in value) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(condo, be used to reduce construction cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(condo, be used to reduce construction cost)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(real estate, increase in value) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(real estate, increase in value)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(real estate, increase in value) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(real estate, increase in value) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(real estate, increase in value)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(real estate, increase in value) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(real estate, increase in value)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(real estate, increase in value) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(condo, be at high rise build)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(real estate, increase in value) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(condo, be used to reduce construction cost)