receiver: have displays

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents radio receiver
Weight: 0.76
, electronic device
Weight: 0.61
, officer
Weight: 0.60
, position
Weight: 0.60
Siblings rusher
Weight: 0.40
, cornerback
Weight: 0.35
, quarterback
Weight: 0.34
, linebacker
Weight: 0.34
, aor
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
have displays 1.00
have looking displays 0.93
have cheap displays 0.92
have cheap looking displays 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(receiver, have displays) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(receiver, have displays)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(receiver, have displays) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(receiver, have cheap displays)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(receiver, have displays) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(receiver, have looking displays)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(receiver, have displays) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(receiver, have cheap looking displays)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(receiver, have displays) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(receiver, have looking displays)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(receiver, have displays) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(receiver, have looking displays)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(receiver, have displays) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(receiver, have looking displays)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(receiver, have displays) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(receiver, have cheap looking displays)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(receiver, have displays) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(receiver, have cheap displays)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(receiver, have displays) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(receiver, have cheap looking displays)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(receiver, have displays) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(receiver, have cheap displays)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(receiver, have displays) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(receiver, have cheap displays)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(receiver, have displays) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(receiver, have cheap looking displays)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(receiver, have displays) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(receiver, have displays) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(receiver, have displays)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(receiver, have displays) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(receiver, have displays)