receptacle: is installed

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents object
Weight: 0.60
, device
Weight: 0.58
, structure
Weight: 0.54
, blade
Weight: 0.51
, mechanism
Weight: 0.51
Siblings bucket
Weight: 0.58
, socket
Weight: 0.58
, vacuum tube
Weight: 0.33
, doorknob
Weight: 0.33
, thermistor
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is installed 1.00
is installed down 0.95
is installed upside down 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(receptacle, is installed)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(socket, is installed upside down)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(receptacle, is installed)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(socket, is installed down)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(receptacle, is installed)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(socket, is installed)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(receptacle, is installed)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(socket, is installed)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(socket, is installed)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(receptacle, is installed)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(socket, is installed down)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(socket, is installed down)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(receptacle, is installed)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(socket, is installed upside down)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(socket, is installed upside down)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(receptacle, is installed)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(receptacle, is installed)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(receptacle, is installed)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(receptacle, is installed down)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(receptacle, is installed)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(receptacle, is installed down)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(receptacle, is installed)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(receptacle, is installed upside down)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(receptacle, is installed)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(receptacle, is installed upside down)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(receptacle, is installed)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(receptacle, is installed down)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(receptacle, is installed)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(receptacle, is installed down)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(receptacle, is installed)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(receptacle, is installed upside down)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(receptacle, is installed)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(receptacle, is installed upside down)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(receptacle, is installed)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(receptacle, is installed)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(receptacle, is installed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(receptacle, is installed)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(receptacle, is installed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(receptacle, is installed)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(socket, is installed)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(receptacle, is installed)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(socket, is installed down)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(receptacle, is installed)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(socket, is installed upside down)