receptacle: is upside down

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents object
Weight: 0.60
, device
Weight: 0.58
, structure
Weight: 0.54
, blade
Weight: 0.51
, mechanism
Weight: 0.51
Siblings bucket
Weight: 0.58
, socket
Weight: 0.58
, vacuum tube
Weight: 0.33
, doorknob
Weight: 0.33
, thermistor
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is upside down 1.00
is installed upside down 0.89
is down 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(receptacle, is upside down) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(socket, is upside down)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(receptacle, is upside down) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(socket, is installed upside down)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(receptacle, is upside down) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(socket, is down)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(receptacle, is upside down) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(socket, is installed upside down) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(socket, is installed upside down)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(receptacle, is upside down) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(socket, is down) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(socket, is down)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(receptacle, is upside down) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(socket, is upside down) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(socket, is upside down)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(receptacle, is upside down) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(receptacle, is upside down)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(receptacle, is upside down) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(receptacle, is installed upside down)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(receptacle, is upside down) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(receptacle, is installed upside down)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(receptacle, is upside down) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(receptacle, is down)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(receptacle, is upside down) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(receptacle, is installed upside down)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(receptacle, is upside down) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(receptacle, is installed upside down)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(receptacle, is upside down) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(receptacle, is down)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(receptacle, is upside down) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(receptacle, is down)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(receptacle, is upside down) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(receptacle, is down)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(receptacle, is upside down) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(receptacle, is upside down) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(receptacle, is upside down)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(receptacle, is upside down) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(receptacle, is upside down)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(receptacle, is upside down) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(socket, is upside down)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(receptacle, is upside down) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(socket, is down)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(receptacle, is upside down) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(socket, is installed upside down)