receptionist: page other employee

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents employee
Weight: 0.69
, woman
Weight: 0.69
, people
Weight: 0.59
, job
Weight: 0.57
, person
Weight: 0.57
Siblings waitress
Weight: 0.36
, salesperson
Weight: 0.36
, waiter
Weight: 0.35
, pregnant woman
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
page other employee 1.00
page representative 0.81
page visitor 0.80
page guest 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.12
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(receptionist, page other employee)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(receptionist, page other employee)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(receptionist, page other employee)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(receptionist, page guest)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(receptionist, page other employee)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(receptionist, page representative)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(receptionist, page other employee)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(receptionist, page representative)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(receptionist, page other employee)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(receptionist, page visitor)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(receptionist, page other employee)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(receptionist, page representative)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(receptionist, page other employee)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(receptionist, page visitor)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(receptionist, page other employee)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(receptionist, page visitor)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(receptionist, page other employee)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(receptionist, page guest)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(receptionist, page other employee)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(receptionist, page visitor)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(receptionist, page other employee)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(receptionist, page representative)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(receptionist, page other employee)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(receptionist, page guest)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(receptionist, page other employee)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(receptionist, page guest)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(receptionist, page other employee)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(receptionist, page other employee)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(receptionist, page other employee)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(receptionist, page other employee)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(receptionist, page other employee)