recognition: be for humans better than recall

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents honor
Weight: 0.61
, achievement
Weight: 0.60
, function
Weight: 0.60
, accolade
Weight: 0.54
Siblings award
Weight: 0.67
, endorsement
Weight: 0.58
, acceptance
Weight: 0.33
, success
Weight: 0.32
, scholarship
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be for humans better than recall 1.00
be better than recall 0.96
be easier than recall 0.91
be important for humans 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(recognition, be for humans better than recall)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(acceptance, be important for humans)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(recognition, be for humans better than recall)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(acceptance, be important for humans)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(acceptance, be important for humans)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(recognition, be for humans better than recall)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(recognition, be for humans better than recall)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(recognition, be for humans better than recall)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(recognition, be better than recall)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(recognition, be for humans better than recall)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(recognition, be better than recall)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(recognition, be for humans better than recall)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(recognition, be easier than recall)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(recognition, be for humans better than recall)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(recognition, be better than recall)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(recognition, be for humans better than recall)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(recognition, be easier than recall)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(recognition, be for humans better than recall)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(recognition, be easier than recall)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(recognition, be for humans better than recall)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(recognition, be easier than recall)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(recognition, be for humans better than recall)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(recognition, be better than recall)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(recognition, be for humans better than recall)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(recognition, be for humans better than recall)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(recognition, be for humans better than recall)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(recognition, be for humans better than recall)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(recognition, be for humans better than recall)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(recognition, be for humans better than recall)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(acceptance, be important for humans)