recognition: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents honor
Weight: 0.61
, achievement
Weight: 0.60
, function
Weight: 0.60
, accolade
Weight: 0.54
Siblings award
Weight: 0.67
, endorsement
Weight: 0.58
, acceptance
Weight: 0.33
, success
Weight: 0.32
, scholarship
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
is good bad thing 0.82
has quality evil 0.80
is bad thing 0.79
has quality difference 0.77
be good for business 0.76
feel good 0.76
is good thing 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(achievement, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(recognition, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(function, has quality difference) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(recognition, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(achievement, has quality evil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(recognition, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(recognition, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(achievement, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(recognition, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(achievement, has quality evil)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(recognition, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(function, has quality difference)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(recognition, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(achievement, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(recognition, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(achievement, has quality evil)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(recognition, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(function, has quality difference)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(recognition, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(success, has quality bad)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(recognition, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(award, has quality bad)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(recognition, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(acceptance, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(recognition, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(award, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(recognition, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(acceptance, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(recognition, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(scholarship, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(recognition, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(success, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(recognition, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(acceptance, is good bad thing)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(recognition, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(acceptance, is bad thing)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(recognition, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(award, be good for business)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(recognition, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(acceptance, is good thing)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(recognition, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(success, feel good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(achievement, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(recognition, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(recognition, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(function, has quality difference) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(recognition, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(recognition, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(achievement, has quality evil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(recognition, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(recognition, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(recognition, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(success, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(success, has quality bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(recognition, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(award, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(award, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(recognition, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(success, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(success, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(recognition, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(acceptance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(acceptance, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(recognition, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(scholarship, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(scholarship, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(recognition, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(acceptance, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(acceptance, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(recognition, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(acceptance, is good bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(acceptance, is good bad thing)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(recognition, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(success, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(success, feel good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(recognition, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(acceptance, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(acceptance, is good thing)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(recognition, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(acceptance, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(acceptance, is bad thing)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(recognition, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(award, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(award, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(recognition, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(award, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(award, be good for business)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(recognition, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(recognition, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(recognition, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(recognition, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(recognition, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(recognition, has quality good)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(recognition, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(recognition, has quality good)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(recognition, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(recognition, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(recognition, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(recognition, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(recognition, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(recognition, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(recognition, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(recognition, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(achievement, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(recognition, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(achievement, has quality evil)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(recognition, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(function, has quality difference)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(recognition, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(success, has quality bad)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(recognition, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(award, has quality bad)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(recognition, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(acceptance, has quality bad)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(recognition, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(success, has quality good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(recognition, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(scholarship, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(recognition, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(acceptance, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(recognition, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(award, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(recognition, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(acceptance, is good bad thing)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(recognition, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(acceptance, is bad thing)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(recognition, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(success, feel good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(recognition, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(acceptance, is good thing)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(recognition, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(award, be good for business)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(recognition, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(achievement, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(recognition, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(achievement, has quality evil)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(recognition, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(function, has quality difference)