recombination: be important in process of selection

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.60
, function
Weight: 0.59
, factor
Weight: 0.56
, process
Weight: 0.51
, mechanism
Weight: 0.50
Siblings trigonometric function
Weight: 0.33
, phagocytosis
Weight: 0.33
, cell signaling
Weight: 0.33
, diffusion
Weight: 0.33
, fluorescence
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in process of selection 1.00
be important in process of natural selection 0.96
be important in process 0.89
be considered process 0.85
be called process 0.84
evaluation of be can process 0.83
evaluation of be can ongoing process 0.82
has physical part process 0.82
be required in gear selection 0.82
is slow process 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(mechanism, be required in gear selection)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(recombination, be important in process of selection)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(process, evaluation of be can ongoing process)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(recombination, be important in process of selection)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(process, evaluation of be can process)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(recombination, be important in process of selection)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(recombination, be important in process of selection)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(process, evaluation of be can process)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(recombination, be important in process of selection)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(process, evaluation of be can ongoing process)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(recombination, be important in process of selection)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(mechanism, be required in gear selection)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(recombination, be important in process of selection)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(mechanism, be required in gear selection)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(recombination, be important in process of selection)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(process, evaluation of be can ongoing process)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(recombination, be important in process of selection)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(process, evaluation of be can process)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(recombination, be important in process of selection)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(phagocytosis, has physical part process)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(recombination, be important in process of selection)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(diffusion, is slow process)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(recombination, be important in process of selection)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(diffusion, has physical part process)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(mechanism, be required in gear selection)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(recombination, be important in process of selection)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(recombination, be important in process of selection)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(process, evaluation of be can ongoing process)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(recombination, be important in process of selection)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(recombination, be important in process of selection)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(process, evaluation of be can process)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(recombination, be important in process of selection)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(recombination, be important in process of selection)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(recombination, be important in process of selection)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(diffusion, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(diffusion, has physical part process)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(recombination, be important in process of selection)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(phagocytosis, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(phagocytosis, has physical part process)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(recombination, be important in process of selection)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(diffusion, is slow process)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(diffusion, is slow process)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(recombination, be important in process of selection)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(recombination, be important in process of selection)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(recombination, be important in process of selection)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(recombination, be important in process of natural selection)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(recombination, be important in process of selection)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(recombination, be important in process)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(recombination, be important in process of selection)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(recombination, be important in process of natural selection)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(recombination, be important in process of selection)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(recombination, be important in process of natural selection)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(recombination, be important in process of selection)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(recombination, be important in process)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(recombination, be important in process of selection)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(recombination, be important in process)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(recombination, be important in process of selection)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(recombination, be important in process of natural selection)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(recombination, be important in process of selection)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(recombination, be important in process)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(recombination, be important in process of selection)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(recombination, be important in process of selection)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(recombination, be important in process of selection)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(recombination, be important in process of selection)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(recombination, be important in process of selection)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(recombination, be important in process of selection)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(process, evaluation of be can process)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(recombination, be important in process of selection)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(process, evaluation of be can ongoing process)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(recombination, be important in process of selection)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(mechanism, be required in gear selection)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(recombination, be important in process of selection)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(diffusion, has physical part process)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(recombination, be important in process of selection)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(phagocytosis, has physical part process)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(recombination, be important in process of selection)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(diffusion, is slow process)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(recombination, be important in process of selection)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(process, evaluation of be can process)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(recombination, be important in process of selection)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(process, evaluation of be can ongoing process)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(recombination, be important in process of selection)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(mechanism, be required in gear selection)