record player: has quality better

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.62
, device
Weight: 0.62
, item
Weight: 0.62
, object
Weight: 0.60
, electronics
Weight: 0.55
Siblings cd player
Weight: 0.36
, tennis player
Weight: 0.35
, dvd player
Weight: 0.35
, playing game
Weight: 0.35
, play game
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality better 1.00
has quality good 0.94

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(device, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(record player, has quality better)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(electronics, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(record player, has quality better)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(record player, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(electronics, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(record player, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(device, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(record player, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(electronics, has quality good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(record player, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(device, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(device, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(record player, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(record player, has quality better)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(electronics, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(record player, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(record player, has quality better)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(record player, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(record player, has quality better)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(record player, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(record player, has quality good)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(record player, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(record player, has quality good)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(record player, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(record player, has quality good)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(record player, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(record player, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(record player, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(record player, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(record player, has quality better)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(record player, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(record player, has quality better)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(record player, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(electronics, has quality good)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(record player, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(device, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(record player, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(electronics, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(record player, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(device, has quality good)