record: be better than cds

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents achievement
Weight: 0.68
, mark
Weight: 0.66
, evidence
Weight: 0.59
, proof
Weight: 0.58
Siblings performance
Weight: 0.65
, date
Weight: 0.64
, old testament
Weight: 0.63
, recording
Weight: 0.61
, contract
Weight: 0.61

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than cds 1.00
be different to cds 0.96
sound better than music 0.77
sound better than digital music 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(record, be better than cds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(record, be better than cds)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(record, be better than cds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(record, be different to cds)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(record, be better than cds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(record, be different to cds)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(record, be better than cds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(record, be different to cds)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(record, be better than cds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(record, be different to cds)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(record, be better than cds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(record, sound better than music)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(record, be better than cds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(record, sound better than digital music)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(record, be better than cds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(record, sound better than music)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(record, be better than cds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(record, sound better than digital music)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(record, be better than cds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(record, sound better than music)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(record, be better than cds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(record, sound better than digital music)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(record, be better than cds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(record, sound better than music)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(record, be better than cds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(record, sound better than digital music)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(record, be better than cds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(record, be better than cds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(record, be better than cds)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(record, be better than cds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(record, be better than cds)