record: has consistency retention

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents achievement
Weight: 0.68
, mark
Weight: 0.66
, evidence
Weight: 0.59
, proof
Weight: 0.58
Siblings performance
Weight: 0.65
, date
Weight: 0.64
, old testament
Weight: 0.63
, recording
Weight: 0.61
, contract
Weight: 0.61

Related properties

Property Similarity
has consistency retention 1.00
has quality good 0.76
has quality better 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(evidence, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(record, has consistency retention)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(record, has consistency retention)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(evidence, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(record, has consistency retention)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(evidence, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(record, has consistency retention)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(performance, has quality better)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(record, has consistency retention)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(date, has quality good)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(record, has consistency retention)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(contract, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(evidence, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(record, has consistency retention)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(record, has consistency retention)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(record, has consistency retention)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(date, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(date, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(record, has consistency retention)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(contract, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(contract, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(record, has consistency retention)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(performance, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(performance, has quality better)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(record, has consistency retention)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(record, has consistency retention)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(record, has consistency retention)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(record, has quality good)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(record, has consistency retention)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(record, has quality better)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(record, has consistency retention)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(record, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(record, has consistency retention)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(record, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(record, has consistency retention)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(record, has quality better)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(record, has consistency retention)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(record, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(record, has consistency retention)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(record, has quality better)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(record, has consistency retention)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(record, has quality better)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(record, has consistency retention)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(record, has consistency retention)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(record, has consistency retention)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(record, has consistency retention)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(record, has consistency retention)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(record, has consistency retention)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(evidence, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(record, has consistency retention)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(date, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(record, has consistency retention)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(contract, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(record, has consistency retention)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(performance, has quality better)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(record, has consistency retention)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(evidence, has quality good)