record: hold music

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents achievement
Weight: 0.68
, mark
Weight: 0.66
, evidence
Weight: 0.59
, proof
Weight: 0.58
Siblings performance
Weight: 0.65
, date
Weight: 0.64
, old testament
Weight: 0.63
, recording
Weight: 0.61
, contract
Weight: 0.61

Related properties

Property Similarity
hold music 1.00
play music 0.85
sound better than music 0.80
sound better than digital music 0.79
hold up days 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(record, hold music)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(contract, hold up days)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(record, hold music)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(contract, hold up days)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(contract, hold up days)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(record, hold music)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(record, hold music)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(record, hold music)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(record, play music)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(record, hold music)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(record, sound better than music)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(record, hold music)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(record, sound better than digital music)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(record, hold music)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(record, play music)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(record, hold music)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(record, play music)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(record, hold music)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(record, sound better than music)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(record, hold music)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(record, play music)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(record, hold music)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(record, sound better than music)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(record, hold music)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(record, sound better than music)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(record, hold music)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(record, sound better than digital music)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(record, hold music)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(record, sound better than digital music)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(record, hold music)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(record, sound better than digital music)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(record, hold music)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(record, hold music)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(record, hold music)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(record, hold music)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(record, hold music)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(record, hold music)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(contract, hold up days)