recording: be on sky failing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents performance
Weight: 0.64
, record
Weight: 0.61
, call
Weight: 0.60
, form
Weight: 0.57
Siblings song
Weight: 0.68
, compact disc
Weight: 0.66
, demo
Weight: 0.56
, electrocardiogram
Weight: 0.51
, duet
Weight: 0.47

Related properties

Property Similarity
be on sky failing 1.00
fail on sky 0.91
be on sky 0.84
was movements in night sky important 0.77
was movements in night sky 0.77
fail on foxtel 0.77
was movements in night sky important to people 0.77
was movements in night sky important to ancient people 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(recording, be on sky failing)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(recording, be on sky failing)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(recording, be on sky failing)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(recording, fail on sky)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(recording, be on sky failing)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(recording, fail on sky)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(recording, be on sky failing)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(recording, fail on sky)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(recording, be on sky failing)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(recording, fail on sky)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(recording, be on sky failing)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(recording, fail on foxtel)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(recording, be on sky failing)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(recording, fail on foxtel)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(recording, be on sky failing)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(recording, fail on foxtel)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(recording, be on sky failing)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(recording, be on sky)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(recording, be on sky failing)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(recording, be on sky)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(recording, be on sky failing)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(recording, fail on foxtel)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(recording, be on sky failing)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(recording, was movements in night sky)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(recording, be on sky failing)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(recording, be on sky)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(recording, be on sky failing)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(recording, be on sky)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(recording, be on sky failing)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(recording, was movements in night sky important to ancient people)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(recording, be on sky failing)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(recording, was movements in night sky important to people)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(recording, be on sky failing)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(recording, was movements in night sky important)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(recording, be on sky failing)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(recording, was movements in night sky)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(recording, be on sky failing)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(recording, was movements in night sky)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(recording, be on sky failing)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(recording, was movements in night sky)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(recording, be on sky failing)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(recording, was movements in night sky important to ancient people)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(recording, be on sky failing)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(recording, was movements in night sky important to ancient people)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(recording, be on sky failing)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(recording, was movements in night sky important)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(recording, be on sky failing)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(recording, was movements in night sky important to people)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(recording, be on sky failing)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(recording, was movements in night sky important to ancient people)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(recording, be on sky failing)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(recording, was movements in night sky important)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(recording, be on sky failing)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(recording, was movements in night sky important)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(recording, be on sky failing)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(recording, was movements in night sky important to people)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(recording, be on sky failing)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(recording, was movements in night sky important to people)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(recording, be on sky failing)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(recording, be on sky failing)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(recording, be on sky failing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(recording, be on sky failing)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(recording, be on sky failing)