recording: was movements in night sky important to ancient people

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents performance
Weight: 0.64
, record
Weight: 0.61
, call
Weight: 0.60
, form
Weight: 0.57
Siblings song
Weight: 0.68
, compact disc
Weight: 0.66
, demo
Weight: 0.56
, electrocardiogram
Weight: 0.51
, duet
Weight: 0.47

Related properties

Property Similarity
was movements in night sky important to ancient people 1.00
was movements in night sky important to people 0.96
was movements in night sky important 0.95
was movements in night sky 0.93
be on sky 0.82
was movements of stars 0.82
fail on sky 0.78
be on sky failing 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(recording, was movements in night sky important to ancient people)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(recording, was movements in night sky important to ancient people)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(recording, was movements in night sky important to ancient people)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(recording, was movements in night sky important to people)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(recording, was movements in night sky important to ancient people)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(recording, was movements in night sky important)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(recording, was movements in night sky important to ancient people)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(recording, was movements in night sky)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(recording, was movements in night sky important to ancient people)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(recording, was movements in night sky)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(recording, was movements in night sky important to ancient people)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(recording, was movements in night sky)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(recording, was movements in night sky important to ancient people)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(recording, was movements of stars)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(recording, was movements in night sky important to ancient people)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(recording, be on sky)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(recording, was movements in night sky important to ancient people)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(recording, was movements in night sky important to people)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(recording, was movements in night sky important to ancient people)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(recording, was movements in night sky important)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(recording, was movements in night sky important to ancient people)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(recording, fail on sky)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(recording, was movements in night sky important to ancient people)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(recording, fail on sky)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(recording, was movements in night sky important to ancient people)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(recording, fail on sky)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(recording, was movements in night sky important to ancient people)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(recording, was movements in night sky)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(recording, was movements in night sky important to ancient people)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(recording, fail on sky)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(recording, was movements in night sky important to ancient people)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(recording, be on sky)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(recording, was movements in night sky important to ancient people)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(recording, was movements of stars)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(recording, was movements in night sky important to ancient people)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(recording, be on sky)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(recording, was movements in night sky important to ancient people)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(recording, was movements in night sky important to people)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(recording, was movements in night sky important to ancient people)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(recording, was movements in night sky important)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(recording, was movements in night sky important to ancient people)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(recording, be on sky failing)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(recording, was movements in night sky important to ancient people)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(recording, be on sky failing)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(recording, was movements in night sky important to ancient people)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(recording, be on sky failing)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(recording, was movements in night sky important to ancient people)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(recording, be on sky failing)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(recording, was movements in night sky important to ancient people)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(recording, was movements of stars)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(recording, was movements in night sky important to ancient people)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(recording, was movements in night sky important to people)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(recording, was movements in night sky important to ancient people)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(recording, was movements in night sky important)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(recording, was movements in night sky important to ancient people)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(recording, be on sky)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(recording, was movements in night sky important to ancient people)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(recording, was movements of stars)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(recording, was movements in night sky important to ancient people)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(recording, was movements in night sky important to ancient people)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(recording, was movements in night sky important to ancient people)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(recording, was movements in night sky important to ancient people)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(recording, was movements in night sky important to ancient people)