recruiter: call at work

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents member
Weight: 0.62
, person
Weight: 0.58
, topic
Weight: 0.57
, employee
Weight: 0.52
, thing
Weight: 0.52
Siblings staff sergeant
Weight: 0.51
, salesperson
Weight: 0.33
, counselor
Weight: 0.33
, family member
Weight: 0.33
, representative
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
call at work 1.00
call 0.92
call from numbers 0.82
call from private numbers 0.80
call instead of email 0.80
work 0.79
keep calling 0.78
stop calling 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(employee, work)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(recruiter, call at work)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(recruiter, call at work)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(employee, work)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(recruiter, call at work)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(employee, work)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(recruiter, call at work)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(counselor, work)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(employee, work)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(recruiter, call at work)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(recruiter, call at work)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(recruiter, call at work)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(counselor, work)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(counselor, work)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(recruiter, call at work)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(recruiter, call at work)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(recruiter, call at work)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(recruiter, call)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(recruiter, call at work)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(recruiter, work)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(recruiter, call at work)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(recruiter, call from private numbers)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(recruiter, call at work)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(recruiter, stop calling)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(recruiter, call at work)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(recruiter, call instead of email)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(recruiter, call at work)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(recruiter, call)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(recruiter, call at work)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(recruiter, stop calling)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(recruiter, call at work)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(recruiter, keep calling)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(recruiter, call at work)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(recruiter, stop calling)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(recruiter, call at work)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(recruiter, call)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(recruiter, call at work)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(recruiter, work)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(recruiter, call at work)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(recruiter, call)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(recruiter, call at work)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(recruiter, work)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(recruiter, call at work)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(recruiter, call instead of email)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(recruiter, call at work)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(recruiter, work)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(recruiter, call at work)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(recruiter, keep calling)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(recruiter, call at work)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(recruiter, call from private numbers)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(recruiter, call at work)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(recruiter, stop calling)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(recruiter, call at work)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(recruiter, keep calling)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(recruiter, call at work)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(recruiter, call instead of email)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(recruiter, call at work)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(recruiter, keep calling)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(recruiter, call at work)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(recruiter, call from private numbers)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(recruiter, call at work)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(recruiter, call instead of email)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(recruiter, call at work)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(recruiter, call from private numbers)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(recruiter, call at work)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(recruiter, call at work)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(recruiter, call at work)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(recruiter, call at work)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(recruiter, call at work)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(recruiter, call at work)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(employee, work)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(recruiter, call at work)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(counselor, work)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(recruiter, call at work)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(employee, work)