recruiter: keep calling

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents member
Weight: 0.62
, person
Weight: 0.58
, topic
Weight: 0.57
, employee
Weight: 0.52
, thing
Weight: 0.52
Siblings staff sergeant
Weight: 0.51
, salesperson
Weight: 0.33
, counselor
Weight: 0.33
, family member
Weight: 0.33
, representative
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
keep calling 1.00
stop calling 0.91
call 0.79
call at work 0.78
call from numbers 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(recruiter, keep calling)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(recruiter, keep calling)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(recruiter, keep calling)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(recruiter, stop calling)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(recruiter, keep calling)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(recruiter, stop calling)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(recruiter, keep calling)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(recruiter, stop calling)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(recruiter, keep calling)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(recruiter, stop calling)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(recruiter, keep calling)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(recruiter, call at work)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(recruiter, keep calling)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(recruiter, call)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(recruiter, keep calling)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(recruiter, call)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(recruiter, keep calling)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(recruiter, call at work)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(recruiter, keep calling)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(recruiter, call)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(recruiter, keep calling)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(recruiter, call at work)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(recruiter, keep calling)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(recruiter, call)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(recruiter, keep calling)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(recruiter, call at work)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(recruiter, keep calling)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(recruiter, keep calling)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(recruiter, keep calling)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(recruiter, keep calling)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(recruiter, keep calling)