recycling: be example of open-loop recycling

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents program
Weight: 0.65
, service
Weight: 0.60
, thing
Weight: 0.60
, project
Weight: 0.60
Siblings landfill
Weight: 0.35
, trash
Weight: 0.34
, garbage
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be example of open-loop recycling 1.00
was called recycling 0.93
be more difficult recycling 0.89
reduce need for landfill 0.77
be than landfill 0.77
produce waste 0.76
produce less waste 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(recycling, be example of open-loop recycling)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(recycling, be example of open-loop recycling)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(recycling, be example of open-loop recycling)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(recycling, was called recycling)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(recycling, be example of open-loop recycling)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(recycling, be more difficult recycling)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(recycling, be example of open-loop recycling)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(recycling, produce waste)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(recycling, be example of open-loop recycling)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(recycling, was called recycling)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(recycling, be example of open-loop recycling)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(recycling, was called recycling)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(recycling, be example of open-loop recycling)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(recycling, produce waste)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(recycling, be example of open-loop recycling)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(recycling, be more difficult recycling)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(recycling, be example of open-loop recycling)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(recycling, produce waste)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(recycling, be example of open-loop recycling)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(recycling, reduce need for landfill)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(recycling, be example of open-loop recycling)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(recycling, produce less waste)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(recycling, be example of open-loop recycling)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(recycling, be than landfill)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(recycling, be example of open-loop recycling)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(recycling, be than landfill)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(recycling, be example of open-loop recycling)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(recycling, be more difficult recycling)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(recycling, be example of open-loop recycling)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(recycling, be than landfill)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(recycling, be example of open-loop recycling)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(recycling, was called recycling)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(recycling, be example of open-loop recycling)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(recycling, reduce need for landfill)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(recycling, be example of open-loop recycling)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(recycling, be more difficult recycling)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(recycling, be example of open-loop recycling)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(recycling, produce less waste)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(recycling, be example of open-loop recycling)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(recycling, reduce need for landfill)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(recycling, be example of open-loop recycling)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(recycling, produce waste)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(recycling, be example of open-loop recycling)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(recycling, produce less waste)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(recycling, be example of open-loop recycling)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(recycling, be than landfill)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(recycling, be example of open-loop recycling)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(recycling, produce less waste)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(recycling, be example of open-loop recycling)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(recycling, reduce need for landfill)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(recycling, be example of open-loop recycling)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(recycling, be example of open-loop recycling)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(recycling, be example of open-loop recycling)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(recycling, be example of open-loop recycling)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(recycling, be example of open-loop recycling)