recycling: be more difficult recycling

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents program
Weight: 0.65
, service
Weight: 0.60
, thing
Weight: 0.60
, project
Weight: 0.60
Siblings landfill
Weight: 0.35
, trash
Weight: 0.34
, garbage
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more difficult recycling 1.00
was called recycling 0.90
be example of open-loop recycling 0.89
reduce need for landfill 0.79
be than landfill 0.78
produce less waste 0.78
be difficult 0.76
is difficult 0.75
produce waste 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(recycling, be more difficult recycling)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(recycling, be more difficult recycling)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(recycling, be more difficult recycling)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(recycling, was called recycling)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(recycling, be more difficult recycling)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(recycling, be example of open-loop recycling)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(recycling, be more difficult recycling)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(recycling, was called recycling)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(recycling, be more difficult recycling)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(recycling, produce waste)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(recycling, be more difficult recycling)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(recycling, be example of open-loop recycling)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(recycling, be more difficult recycling)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(recycling, be example of open-loop recycling)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(recycling, be more difficult recycling)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(recycling, be than landfill)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(recycling, be more difficult recycling)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(recycling, produce waste)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(recycling, be more difficult recycling)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(recycling, was called recycling)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(recycling, be more difficult recycling)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(recycling, reduce need for landfill)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(recycling, be more difficult recycling)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(recycling, be than landfill)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(recycling, be more difficult recycling)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(recycling, is difficult)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(recycling, be more difficult recycling)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(recycling, produce waste)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(recycling, be more difficult recycling)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(recycling, reduce need for landfill)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(recycling, be more difficult recycling)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(recycling, be difficult)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(recycling, be more difficult recycling)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(recycling, be difficult)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(recycling, be more difficult recycling)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(recycling, is difficult)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(recycling, be more difficult recycling)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(recycling, is difficult)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(recycling, be more difficult recycling)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(recycling, produce less waste)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(recycling, be more difficult recycling)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(recycling, produce less waste)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(recycling, be more difficult recycling)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(recycling, is difficult)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(recycling, be more difficult recycling)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(recycling, be difficult)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(recycling, be more difficult recycling)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(recycling, produce less waste)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(recycling, be more difficult recycling)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(recycling, produce less waste)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(recycling, be more difficult recycling)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(recycling, reduce need for landfill)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(recycling, be more difficult recycling)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(recycling, be example of open-loop recycling)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(recycling, be more difficult recycling)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(recycling, be than landfill)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(recycling, be more difficult recycling)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(recycling, be difficult)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(recycling, be more difficult recycling)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(recycling, reduce need for landfill)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(recycling, be more difficult recycling)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(recycling, be than landfill)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(recycling, be more difficult recycling)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(recycling, was called recycling)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(recycling, be more difficult recycling)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(recycling, produce waste)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(recycling, be more difficult recycling)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(recycling, be more difficult recycling)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(recycling, be more difficult recycling)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(recycling, be more difficult recycling)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(recycling, be more difficult recycling)