recycling: be than landfill

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents program
Weight: 0.65
, service
Weight: 0.60
, thing
Weight: 0.60
, project
Weight: 0.60
Siblings landfill
Weight: 0.35
, trash
Weight: 0.34
, garbage
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be than landfill 1.00
reduce need for landfill 0.93
decrease amount in landfills 0.85
was called recycling 0.79
be more difficult recycling 0.78
produce less waste 0.77
produce waste 0.77
be example of open-loop recycling 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(recycling, be than landfill)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(recycling, be than landfill)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(recycling, be than landfill)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(recycling, reduce need for landfill)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(recycling, be than landfill)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(recycling, decrease amount in landfills)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(recycling, be than landfill)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(recycling, reduce need for landfill)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(recycling, be than landfill)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(recycling, produce waste)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(recycling, be than landfill)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(recycling, produce waste)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(recycling, be than landfill)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(recycling, decrease amount in landfills)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(recycling, be than landfill)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(recycling, be example of open-loop recycling)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(recycling, be than landfill)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(recycling, be more difficult recycling)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(recycling, be than landfill)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(recycling, produce less waste)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(recycling, be than landfill)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(recycling, was called recycling)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(recycling, be than landfill)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(recycling, was called recycling)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(recycling, be than landfill)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(recycling, reduce need for landfill)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(recycling, be than landfill)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(recycling, produce less waste)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(recycling, be than landfill)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(recycling, decrease amount in landfills)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(recycling, be than landfill)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(recycling, produce waste)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(recycling, be than landfill)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(recycling, be more difficult recycling)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(recycling, be than landfill)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(recycling, reduce need for landfill)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(recycling, be than landfill)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(recycling, be example of open-loop recycling)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(recycling, be than landfill)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(recycling, was called recycling)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(recycling, be than landfill)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(recycling, was called recycling)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(recycling, be than landfill)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(recycling, produce less waste)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(recycling, be than landfill)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(recycling, be example of open-loop recycling)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(recycling, be than landfill)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(recycling, decrease amount in landfills)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(recycling, be than landfill)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(recycling, be more difficult recycling)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(recycling, be than landfill)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(recycling, produce waste)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(recycling, be than landfill)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(recycling, be example of open-loop recycling)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(recycling, be than landfill)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(recycling, be more difficult recycling)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(recycling, be than landfill)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(recycling, produce less waste)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(recycling, be than landfill)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(recycling, be than landfill)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(recycling, be than landfill)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(recycling, be than landfill)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(recycling, be than landfill)