recycling: decrease amount in landfills

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents program
Weight: 0.65
, service
Weight: 0.60
, thing
Weight: 0.60
, project
Weight: 0.60
Siblings landfill
Weight: 0.35
, trash
Weight: 0.34
, garbage
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
decrease amount in landfills 1.00
reduce need for landfill 0.87
be than landfill 0.85
reduce amount of energy used by industry 0.78
produce less waste 0.77
produce waste 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(recycling, decrease amount in landfills)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(recycling, decrease amount in landfills)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(recycling, decrease amount in landfills)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(recycling, reduce amount of energy used by industry)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(recycling, decrease amount in landfills)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(recycling, produce waste)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(recycling, decrease amount in landfills)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(recycling, be than landfill)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(recycling, decrease amount in landfills)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(recycling, reduce amount of energy used by industry)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(recycling, decrease amount in landfills)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(recycling, produce waste)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(recycling, decrease amount in landfills)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(recycling, reduce need for landfill)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(recycling, decrease amount in landfills)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(recycling, be than landfill)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(recycling, decrease amount in landfills)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(recycling, produce waste)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(recycling, decrease amount in landfills)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(recycling, reduce need for landfill)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(recycling, decrease amount in landfills)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(recycling, reduce need for landfill)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(recycling, decrease amount in landfills)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(recycling, reduce amount of energy used by industry)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(recycling, decrease amount in landfills)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(recycling, produce less waste)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(recycling, decrease amount in landfills)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(recycling, produce less waste)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(recycling, decrease amount in landfills)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(recycling, be than landfill)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(recycling, decrease amount in landfills)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(recycling, produce less waste)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(recycling, decrease amount in landfills)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(recycling, be than landfill)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(recycling, decrease amount in landfills)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(recycling, produce less waste)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(recycling, decrease amount in landfills)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(recycling, reduce need for landfill)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(recycling, decrease amount in landfills)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(recycling, produce waste)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(recycling, decrease amount in landfills)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(recycling, reduce amount of energy used by industry)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(recycling, decrease amount in landfills)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(recycling, decrease amount in landfills)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(recycling, decrease amount in landfills)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(recycling, decrease amount in landfills)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(recycling, decrease amount in landfills)