recycling: hurt environment

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents program
Weight: 0.65
, service
Weight: 0.60
, thing
Weight: 0.60
, project
Weight: 0.60
Siblings landfill
Weight: 0.35
, trash
Weight: 0.34
, garbage can
Weight: 0.34
, garbage
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
hurt environment 1.00
affect environment 0.89
be in environment 0.85
help environment 0.84
be better for environment 0.84
be for environment 0.84
be good for environment 0.84
be on environment 0.84
minimise impact on environment 0.84
be important to environment 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(recycling, hurt environment)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(landfill, be good for environment)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(recycling, hurt environment)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(trash, affect environment)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(recycling, hurt environment)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(garbage, affect environment)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(recycling, hurt environment)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(landfill, affect environment)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(recycling, hurt environment)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(landfill, help environment)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(recycling, hurt environment)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(landfill, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(landfill, affect environment)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(recycling, hurt environment)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(garbage, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(garbage, affect environment)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(recycling, hurt environment)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(trash, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(trash, affect environment)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(recycling, hurt environment)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(landfill, help environment)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(landfill, help environment)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(recycling, hurt environment)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(landfill, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(landfill, be good for environment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(recycling, hurt environment)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(recycling, hurt environment)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(recycling, hurt environment)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(recycling, affect environment)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(recycling, hurt environment)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(recycling, be in environment)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(recycling, hurt environment)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(recycling, be on environment)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(recycling, hurt environment)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(recycling, help environment)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(recycling, hurt environment)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(recycling, affect environment)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(recycling, hurt environment)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(recycling, be for environment)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(recycling, hurt environment)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(recycling, be on environment)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(recycling, hurt environment)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(recycling, be in environment)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(recycling, hurt environment)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(recycling, help environment)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(recycling, hurt environment)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(recycling, be for environment)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(recycling, hurt environment)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(recycling, be important to environment)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(recycling, hurt environment)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(recycling, affect environment)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(recycling, hurt environment)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(recycling, be better for environment)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(recycling, hurt environment)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(recycling, be good for environment)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(recycling, hurt environment)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(recycling, be on environment)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(recycling, hurt environment)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(recycling, be in environment)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(recycling, hurt environment)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(recycling, be better for environment)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(recycling, hurt environment)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(recycling, be important to environment)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(recycling, hurt environment)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(recycling, help environment)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(recycling, hurt environment)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(recycling, be good for environment)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(recycling, hurt environment)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(recycling, be for environment)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(recycling, hurt environment)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(recycling, be better for environment)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(recycling, hurt environment)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(recycling, be good for environment)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(recycling, hurt environment)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(recycling, be better for environment)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(recycling, hurt environment)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(recycling, be good for environment)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(recycling, hurt environment)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(recycling, be important to environment)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(recycling, hurt environment)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(recycling, affect environment)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(recycling, hurt environment)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(recycling, be important to environment)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(recycling, hurt environment)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(recycling, be for environment)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(recycling, hurt environment)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(recycling, be in environment)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(recycling, hurt environment)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(recycling, help environment)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(recycling, hurt environment)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(recycling, be on environment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(recycling, hurt environment)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(recycling, hurt environment)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(recycling, hurt environment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(recycling, hurt environment)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(recycling, hurt environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(recycling, hurt environment)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(garbage, affect environment)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(recycling, hurt environment)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(trash, affect environment)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(recycling, hurt environment)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(landfill, affect environment)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(recycling, hurt environment)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(landfill, help environment)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(recycling, hurt environment)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(landfill, be good for environment)