recycling: minimise impact of human activities on environment

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents program
Weight: 0.65
, service
Weight: 0.60
, thing
Weight: 0.60
, project
Weight: 0.60
Siblings landfill
Weight: 0.35
, trash
Weight: 0.34
, garbage can
Weight: 0.34
, garbage
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
minimise impact of human activities on environment 1.00
minimise impact of activities on environment 0.97
minimise impact on environment 0.91
affect environment 0.86
be on environment 0.84
be in environment 0.83
be important to environment 0.82
be for environment 0.82
help environment 0.81
be good for environment 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(recycling, minimise impact of human activities on environment)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(landfill, be good for environment)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(recycling, minimise impact of human activities on environment)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(landfill, help environment)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.05
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(recycling, minimise impact of human activities on environment)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(trash, affect environment)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.04
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(recycling, minimise impact of human activities on environment)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(garbage, affect environment)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.02
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(recycling, minimise impact of human activities on environment)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(landfill, affect environment)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(recycling, minimise impact of human activities on environment)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(landfill, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(landfill, affect environment)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(recycling, minimise impact of human activities on environment)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(garbage, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(garbage, affect environment)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(recycling, minimise impact of human activities on environment)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(trash, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(trash, affect environment)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(recycling, minimise impact of human activities on environment)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(landfill, help environment)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(landfill, help environment)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(recycling, minimise impact of human activities on environment)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(landfill, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(landfill, be good for environment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(recycling, minimise impact of human activities on environment)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(recycling, minimise impact of human activities on environment)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(recycling, minimise impact of human activities on environment)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(recycling, affect environment)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(recycling, minimise impact of human activities on environment)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(recycling, be on environment)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(recycling, minimise impact of human activities on environment)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(recycling, affect environment)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(recycling, minimise impact of human activities on environment)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(recycling, be in environment)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(recycling, minimise impact of human activities on environment)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(recycling, be on environment)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(recycling, minimise impact of human activities on environment)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(recycling, be important to environment)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(recycling, minimise impact of human activities on environment)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(recycling, be for environment)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(recycling, minimise impact of human activities on environment)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(recycling, help environment)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(recycling, minimise impact of human activities on environment)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(recycling, be in environment)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(recycling, minimise impact of human activities on environment)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(recycling, be good for environment)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(recycling, minimise impact of human activities on environment)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(recycling, help environment)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(recycling, minimise impact of human activities on environment)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(recycling, be for environment)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(recycling, minimise impact of human activities on environment)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(recycling, be on environment)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(recycling, minimise impact of human activities on environment)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(recycling, affect environment)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(recycling, minimise impact of human activities on environment)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(recycling, be in environment)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(recycling, minimise impact of human activities on environment)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(recycling, help environment)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(recycling, minimise impact of human activities on environment)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(recycling, be on environment)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(recycling, minimise impact of human activities on environment)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(recycling, affect environment)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(recycling, minimise impact of human activities on environment)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(recycling, be in environment)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(recycling, minimise impact of human activities on environment)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(recycling, be for environment)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(recycling, minimise impact of human activities on environment)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(recycling, help environment)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(recycling, minimise impact of human activities on environment)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(recycling, be for environment)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(recycling, minimise impact of human activities on environment)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(recycling, be important to environment)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(recycling, minimise impact of human activities on environment)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(recycling, be good for environment)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(recycling, minimise impact of human activities on environment)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(recycling, be important to environment)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(recycling, minimise impact of human activities on environment)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(recycling, be important to environment)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(recycling, minimise impact of human activities on environment)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(recycling, be good for environment)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(recycling, minimise impact of human activities on environment)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(recycling, be good for environment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(recycling, minimise impact of human activities on environment)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(recycling, minimise impact of human activities on environment)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(recycling, minimise impact of human activities on environment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(recycling, minimise impact of human activities on environment)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(recycling, minimise impact of human activities on environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(recycling, minimise impact of human activities on environment)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(garbage, affect environment)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(recycling, minimise impact of human activities on environment)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(trash, affect environment)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(recycling, minimise impact of human activities on environment)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(landfill, affect environment)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(recycling, minimise impact of human activities on environment)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(landfill, help environment)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(recycling, minimise impact of human activities on environment)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(landfill, be good for environment)