red cabbage: is good indicator

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dish
Weight: 0.73
, vegetable
Weight: 0.66
, salad
Weight: 0.64
, variety
Weight: 0.63
, green
Weight: 0.59
Siblings potato salad
Weight: 0.39
, cabbage
Weight: 0.38
, cauliflower
Weight: 0.38
, fruit salad
Weight: 0.38
, tomato sauce
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
is good indicator 1.00
make good indicator 0.98
is indicator 0.98
make indicator 0.97
be used as indicator 0.96
be used as small indicator 0.94
make good ph indicator 0.92
be such good indicator of ph 0.92
is ph indicator 0.90
make ph indicator 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(red cabbage, is good indicator)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(cabbage, is good indicator)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(red cabbage, is good indicator)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(cabbage, make good indicator)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(red cabbage, is good indicator)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(cabbage, make good ph indicator)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(red cabbage, is good indicator)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(cabbage, is indicator)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(red cabbage, is good indicator)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(cabbage, is ph indicator)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(red cabbage, is good indicator)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(cabbage, be used as indicator)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(red cabbage, is good indicator)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(cabbage, be used as indicator)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(red cabbage, is good indicator)
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(cabbage, make good indicator)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(cabbage, make good indicator)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(red cabbage, is good indicator)
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(cabbage, is good indicator)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(cabbage, is good indicator)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(red cabbage, is good indicator)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(cabbage, is indicator)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(cabbage, is indicator)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(red cabbage, is good indicator)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(cabbage, make good ph indicator)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(cabbage, make good ph indicator)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(red cabbage, is good indicator)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(cabbage, be used as indicator)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(cabbage, be used as indicator)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(red cabbage, is good indicator)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(cabbage, be used as indicator)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(cabbage, be used as indicator)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(red cabbage, is good indicator)
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(cabbage, is ph indicator)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(cabbage, is ph indicator)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(red cabbage, is good indicator)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(red cabbage, is good indicator)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(red cabbage, is good indicator)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(red cabbage, be used as indicator)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(red cabbage, is good indicator)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(red cabbage, be used as indicator)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(red cabbage, is good indicator)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(red cabbage, make indicator)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(red cabbage, is good indicator)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(red cabbage, is indicator)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(red cabbage, is good indicator)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(red cabbage, make good indicator)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(red cabbage, is good indicator)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(red cabbage, be used as small indicator)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(red cabbage, is good indicator)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(red cabbage, make indicator)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(red cabbage, is good indicator)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(red cabbage, make ph indicator)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(red cabbage, is good indicator)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(red cabbage, be used as indicator)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(red cabbage, is good indicator)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(red cabbage, be used as indicator)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(red cabbage, is good indicator)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(red cabbage, be used as small indicator)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(red cabbage, is good indicator)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(red cabbage, make good ph indicator)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(red cabbage, is good indicator)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(red cabbage, is indicator)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(red cabbage, is good indicator)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(red cabbage, make ph indicator)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(red cabbage, is good indicator)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(red cabbage, be used as small indicator)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(red cabbage, is good indicator)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(red cabbage, is ph indicator)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(red cabbage, is good indicator)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(red cabbage, make good ph indicator)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(red cabbage, is good indicator)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(red cabbage, make good ph indicator)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(red cabbage, is good indicator)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(red cabbage, make ph indicator)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(red cabbage, is good indicator)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(red cabbage, is ph indicator)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(red cabbage, is good indicator)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(red cabbage, is ph indicator)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(red cabbage, is good indicator)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(red cabbage, make good indicator)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(red cabbage, is good indicator)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(red cabbage, be used as indicator)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(red cabbage, is good indicator)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(red cabbage, be used as indicator)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(red cabbage, is good indicator)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(red cabbage, make good indicator)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(red cabbage, is good indicator)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(red cabbage, be such good indicator of ph)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(red cabbage, is good indicator)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(red cabbage, is ph indicator)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(red cabbage, is good indicator)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(red cabbage, is indicator)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(red cabbage, is good indicator)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(red cabbage, make ph indicator)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(red cabbage, is good indicator)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(red cabbage, make good ph indicator)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(red cabbage, is good indicator)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(red cabbage, make indicator)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(red cabbage, is good indicator)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(red cabbage, is indicator)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(red cabbage, is good indicator)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(red cabbage, make indicator)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(red cabbage, is good indicator)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(red cabbage, be such good indicator of ph)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(red cabbage, is good indicator)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(red cabbage, be used as small indicator)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(red cabbage, is good indicator)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(red cabbage, be such good indicator of ph)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(red cabbage, is good indicator)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(red cabbage, make good indicator)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(red cabbage, is good indicator)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(red cabbage, be such good indicator of ph)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(red cabbage, is good indicator)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(red cabbage, be used as indicator)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(red cabbage, is good indicator)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(red cabbage, be used as indicator)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(red cabbage, is good indicator)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(red cabbage, is good indicator)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(red cabbage, is good indicator)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(red cabbage, is good indicator)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(red cabbage, is good indicator)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(red cabbage, is good indicator)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(cabbage, make good ph indicator)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(red cabbage, is good indicator)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(cabbage, make good indicator)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(red cabbage, is good indicator)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(cabbage, is good indicator)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(red cabbage, is good indicator)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(cabbage, is indicator)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(red cabbage, is good indicator)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(cabbage, be used as indicator)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(red cabbage, is good indicator)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(cabbage, is ph indicator)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(red cabbage, is good indicator)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(cabbage, be used as indicator)