red fox: act around red foxes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fox
Weight: 0.75
, animal
Weight: 0.72
, arctic fox
Weight: 0.71
, species
Weight: 0.69
, mammal
Weight: 0.67
Siblings red squirrel
Weight: 0.40
, gray fox
Weight: 0.39
, red panda
Weight: 0.38
, brown bear
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
act around red foxes 1.00
act around other red foxes 0.99
act around foxes 0.98
act around other foxes 0.97
be called red foxes 0.95
be called foxes 0.92
have red fur 0.79
have white fur 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(fox, be called foxes)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(red fox, act around red foxes)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(arctic fox, be called foxes)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(red fox, act around red foxes)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(arctic fox, have white fur)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(red fox, act around red foxes)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(red fox, act around red foxes)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, have white fur)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(red fox, act around red foxes)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, be called foxes)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(red fox, act around red foxes)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(fox, be called foxes)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(red fox, act around red foxes)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have white fur)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(red fox, act around red foxes)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, be called foxes)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(red fox, act around red foxes)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(fox, be called foxes)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(red fox, act around red foxes)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(red panda, have red fur)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(red fox, act around red foxes)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(red squirrel, have red fur)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(fox, be called foxes)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(red fox, act around red foxes)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(red fox, act around red foxes)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(arctic fox, be called foxes)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(red fox, act around red foxes)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(red fox, act around red foxes)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(arctic fox, have white fur)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(red fox, act around red foxes)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(red fox, act around red foxes)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(red fox, act around red foxes)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(red squirrel, have red fur)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(red squirrel, have red fur)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(red fox, act around red foxes)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(red panda, have red fur)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(red panda, have red fur)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(red fox, act around red foxes)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(red fox, act around red foxes)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(red fox, act around red foxes)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(red fox, act around other red foxes)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(red fox, act around red foxes)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(red fox, act around other foxes)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(red fox, act around red foxes)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(red fox, act around foxes)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(red fox, act around red foxes)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(red fox, be called red foxes)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(red fox, act around red foxes)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(red fox, be called red foxes)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(red fox, act around red foxes)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(red fox, be called foxes)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(red fox, act around red foxes)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(red fox, act around foxes)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(red fox, act around red foxes)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(red fox, be called red foxes)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(red fox, act around red foxes)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(red fox, act around foxes)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(red fox, act around red foxes)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(red fox, act around other red foxes)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(red fox, act around red foxes)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(red fox, act around other foxes)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(red fox, act around red foxes)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(red fox, have red fur)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(red fox, act around red foxes)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(red fox, be called foxes)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(red fox, act around red foxes)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(red fox, be called red foxes)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(red fox, act around red foxes)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(red fox, act around foxes)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(red fox, act around red foxes)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(red fox, be called foxes)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(red fox, act around red foxes)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(red fox, have white fur)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(red fox, act around red foxes)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(red fox, have white fur)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(red fox, act around red foxes)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have white fur)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(red fox, act around red foxes)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(red fox, be called foxes)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(red fox, act around red foxes)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(red fox, have red fur)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(red fox, act around red foxes)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(red fox, have red fur)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(red fox, act around red foxes)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have red fur)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(red fox, act around red foxes)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(red fox, have white fur)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(red fox, act around red foxes)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(red fox, act around other foxes)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(red fox, act around red foxes)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(red fox, act around other red foxes)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(red fox, act around red foxes)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(red fox, act around other foxes)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(red fox, act around red foxes)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(red fox, act around other red foxes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(red fox, act around red foxes)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(red fox, act around red foxes)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(red fox, act around red foxes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(red fox, act around red foxes)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(red fox, act around red foxes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(red fox, act around red foxes)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(arctic fox, be called foxes)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(red fox, act around red foxes)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(arctic fox, have white fur)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(red fox, act around red foxes)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(fox, be called foxes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(red fox, act around red foxes)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(red squirrel, have red fur)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(red fox, act around red foxes)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(red panda, have red fur)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(red fox, act around red foxes)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(arctic fox, be called foxes)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(red fox, act around red foxes)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(fox, be called foxes)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(red fox, act around red foxes)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(arctic fox, have white fur)