red fox: adapt to environment

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fox
Weight: 0.75
, animal
Weight: 0.72
, arctic fox
Weight: 0.71
, species
Weight: 0.69
, mammal
Weight: 0.67
Siblings red squirrel
Weight: 0.40
, gray fox
Weight: 0.39
, red panda
Weight: 0.38
, brown bear
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
adapt to environment 1.00
be important to environment 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(arctic fox, be important to environment)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(red fox, adapt to environment)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(red fox, adapt to environment)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, be important to environment)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(red fox, adapt to environment)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, be important to environment)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(arctic fox, be important to environment)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(red fox, adapt to environment)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(red fox, adapt to environment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(red fox, adapt to environment)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(red fox, adapt to environment)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(red fox, adapt to environment)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(red fox, be important to environment)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(red fox, adapt to environment)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(red fox, be important to environment)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(red fox, adapt to environment)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(red fox, be important to environment)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(red fox, adapt to environment)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(red fox, be important to environment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(red fox, adapt to environment)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(red fox, adapt to environment)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(red fox, adapt to environment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(red fox, adapt to environment)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(red fox, adapt to environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(red fox, adapt to environment)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(arctic fox, be important to environment)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.13
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(red fox, adapt to environment)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(arctic fox, be important to environment)