red fox: be invasive species in australia

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fox
Weight: 0.75
, animal
Weight: 0.72
, arctic fox
Weight: 0.71
, species
Weight: 0.69
, mammal
Weight: 0.67
Siblings red squirrel
Weight: 0.40
, gray fox
Weight: 0.39
, red panda
Weight: 0.38
, brown bear
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be invasive species in australia 1.00
is invasive species 0.93
is invasive 0.87
have in australia pests 0.85
is species 0.85
be problem in australia 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(species, is invasive)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(red fox, be invasive species in australia)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(red fox, be invasive species in australia)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(species, is invasive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(red fox, be invasive species in australia)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(species, is invasive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(red fox, be invasive species in australia)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(brown bear, is species)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(species, is invasive)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(red fox, be invasive species in australia)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(red fox, be invasive species in australia)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(red fox, be invasive species in australia)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(brown bear, is species)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(brown bear, is species)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(red fox, be invasive species in australia)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(red fox, be invasive species in australia)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(red fox, be invasive species in australia)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(red fox, is species)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(red fox, be invasive species in australia)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(red fox, is invasive species)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(red fox, be invasive species in australia)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(red fox, is invasive species)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(red fox, be invasive species in australia)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(red fox, is invasive species)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(red fox, be invasive species in australia)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(red fox, is species)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(red fox, be invasive species in australia)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(red fox, is invasive species)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(red fox, be invasive species in australia)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(red fox, is species)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(red fox, be invasive species in australia)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(red fox, is invasive)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(red fox, be invasive species in australia)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have in australia pests)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(red fox, be invasive species in australia)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(red fox, be problem in australia)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(red fox, be invasive species in australia)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(red fox, have in australia pests)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(red fox, be invasive species in australia)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(red fox, is invasive)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(red fox, be invasive species in australia)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(red fox, is species)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(red fox, be invasive species in australia)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(red fox, be problem in australia)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(red fox, be invasive species in australia)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(red fox, have in australia pests)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(red fox, be invasive species in australia)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(red fox, have in australia pests)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(red fox, be invasive species in australia)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(red fox, is invasive)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(red fox, be invasive species in australia)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(red fox, is invasive)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(red fox, be invasive species in australia)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(red fox, be problem in australia)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(red fox, be invasive species in australia)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(red fox, be problem in australia)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(red fox, be invasive species in australia)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(red fox, be invasive species in australia)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(red fox, be invasive species in australia)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(red fox, be invasive species in australia)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(red fox, be invasive species in australia)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(red fox, be invasive species in australia)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(species, is invasive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(red fox, be invasive species in australia)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(brown bear, is species)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(red fox, be invasive species in australia)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(species, is invasive)