red fox: has physical part claws

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fox
Weight: 0.75
, animal
Weight: 0.72
, arctic fox
Weight: 0.71
, species
Weight: 0.69
, mammal
Weight: 0.67
Siblings red squirrel
Weight: 0.40
, gray fox
Weight: 0.39
, red panda
Weight: 0.38
, brown bear
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part claws 1.00
have sharp claws 0.89
has physical part teeth 0.87
has physical part tails 0.83
has physical part tail 0.82
has physical part legs 0.82
has physical part whiskers 0.81
has physical part ears 0.80
has physical part noses 0.79
have sharp teeth 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part claws)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part claws)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(fox, have sharp claws)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part claws)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(fox, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part claws)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(mammal, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part claws)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(fox, has physical part tail)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part claws)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part legs)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part claws)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part claws)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part claws)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part noses)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part claws)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part tail)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part claws)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part claws)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(red fox, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part tail)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(red fox, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part ears)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(red fox, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(red fox, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part noses)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(red fox, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(fox, has physical part ears)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(red fox, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(fox, have sharp claws)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(red fox, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part legs)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(red fox, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(mammal, has physical part tails)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(red fox, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(fox, has physical part tail)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(red fox, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(fox, has physical part tails)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(red fox, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, has physical part tails)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(red fox, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, has physical part whiskers)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part tail)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part ears)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(fox, have sharp claws)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(fox, has physical part ears)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part noses)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part legs)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(fox, has physical part tail)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(fox, has physical part tails)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(mammal, has physical part tails)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, has physical part tails)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(animal, has physical part whiskers)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(red panda, has physical part whiskers)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(red panda, has physical part tails)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(red squirrel, has physical part tails)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part claws)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part claws)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(fox, have sharp claws)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part claws)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(fox, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part claws)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(mammal, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part claws)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(fox, has physical part tail)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part claws)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part legs)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part claws)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part claws)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part tail)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part claws)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part claws)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part noses)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part claws)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part claws)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(red fox, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(red panda, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(red panda, has physical part whiskers)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(red fox, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(red panda, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(red panda, has physical part tails)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(red fox, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(red squirrel, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(red squirrel, has physical part tails)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(red fox, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(red fox, has physical part claws)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(red fox, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(red fox, have sharp claws)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(red fox, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(red fox, have sharp claws)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(red fox, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(red fox, have sharp claws)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(red fox, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part ears)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(red fox, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(red fox, has physical part ears)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part ears)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(red fox, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part teeth)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(red fox, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part noses)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have sharp claws)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(red fox, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(red fox, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(red fox, has physical part teeth)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part teeth)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(red fox, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(red fox, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part noses)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(red fox, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(red fox, has physical part noses)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(red fox, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part teeth)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(red fox, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part ears)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have sharp teeth)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(red fox, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(red fox, have sharp teeth)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part noses)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(red fox, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(red fox, have sharp teeth)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(red fox, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(red fox, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part legs)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part tails)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(red fox, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part legs)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(red fox, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(red fox, has physical part legs)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(red fox, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(red fox, have sharp teeth)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(red fox, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part tail)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(red fox, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part tail)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part legs)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part tail)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(red fox, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part tails)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(red fox, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(red fox, has physical part tails)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(red fox, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(red fox, has physical part tail)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(red fox, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part tails)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(red fox, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part claws)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(red fox, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part claws)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(arctic fox, has physical part tail)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(arctic fox, has physical part ears)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(arctic fox, has physical part noses)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(fox, have sharp claws)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(arctic fox, has physical part legs)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(mammal, has physical part tails)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(fox, has physical part ears)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(fox, has physical part tail)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(fox, has physical part tails)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part tails)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part whiskers)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(red panda, has physical part whiskers)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(red panda, has physical part tails)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(red squirrel, has physical part tails)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(red fox, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(arctic fox, has physical part tail)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(red fox, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(arctic fox, has physical part ears)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(red fox, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(arctic fox, has physical part noses)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(red fox, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(red fox, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(fox, have sharp claws)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(red fox, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(arctic fox, has physical part legs)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(red fox, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(mammal, has physical part tails)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(red fox, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(fox, has physical part ears)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(red fox, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(fox, has physical part tail)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(red fox, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(fox, has physical part tails)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(red fox, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part tails)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(red fox, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part whiskers)