red fox: has physical part ears

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fox
Weight: 0.75
, animal
Weight: 0.72
, arctic fox
Weight: 0.71
, species
Weight: 0.69
, mammal
Weight: 0.67
Siblings red squirrel
Weight: 0.40
, gray fox
Weight: 0.39
, red panda
Weight: 0.38
, brown bear
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part ears 1.00
have big ears 0.89
has physical part teeth 0.85
has physical part legs 0.84
has physical part noses 0.84
has physical part tails 0.81
has physical part whiskers 0.81
has physical part claws 0.80
has physical part tail 0.80
have pointy ears 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part ears)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part ears)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part ears)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(fox, have big ears)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part ears)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part ears)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(fox, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part ears)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part legs)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part ears)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(mammal, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part ears)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(fox, has physical part tail)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part ears)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part noses)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part ears)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part ears)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part tail)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part ears)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(red fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part ears)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(red fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(fox, has physical part ears)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(red fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part tail)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(red fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part noses)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(red fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(red fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part legs)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(red fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(fox, have big ears)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(red fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(mammal, has physical part tails)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(red fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(fox, has physical part tail)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(red fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(fox, has physical part tails)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(red fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, has physical part whiskers)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(red fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, has physical part tails)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part ears)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(fox, has physical part ears)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(fox, have big ears)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part noses)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part legs)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part tail)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(fox, has physical part tails)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(fox, has physical part tail)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(mammal, has physical part tails)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, has physical part tails)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(animal, has physical part whiskers)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(red panda, have big ears)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(red panda, has physical part whiskers)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(red panda, has physical part tails)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(red squirrel, has physical part tails)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part ears)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part ears)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(fox, have big ears)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part ears)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part ears)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part ears)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part legs)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part ears)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part noses)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part ears)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(fox, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part ears)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(mammal, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part ears)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(fox, has physical part tail)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part ears)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part ears)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part tail)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part ears)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(red fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(red panda, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(red panda, has physical part whiskers)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(red fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(red panda, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(red panda, has physical part tails)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(red fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(red squirrel, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(red squirrel, has physical part tails)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(red fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(red panda, have big ears)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(red panda, have big ears)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(red fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(red fox, has physical part ears)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(red fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part noses)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(red fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part noses)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have big ears)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(red fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(red fox, has physical part noses)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(red fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(red fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part teeth)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(red fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(red fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(red fox, has physical part teeth)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(red fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part teeth)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(red fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(red fox, have big ears)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(red fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(red fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(red fox, have pointy ears)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have pointy ears)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(red fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part legs)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part noses)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(red fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part claws)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part teeth)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(red fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part claws)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(red fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(red fox, have pointy ears)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(red fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(red fox, has physical part claws)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(red fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part legs)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(red fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(red fox, has physical part legs)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(red fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(red fox, have big ears)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(red fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part tail)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(red fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(red fox, have pointy ears)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part claws)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part tails)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(red fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part tail)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(red fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part tails)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(red fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(red fox, have big ears)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(red fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(red fox, has physical part tails)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(red fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part tails)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(red fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(red fox, has physical part tail)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part legs)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part tail)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(red fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part ears)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(red fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part ears)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(arctic fox, has physical part ears)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(fox, has physical part ears)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(arctic fox, has physical part noses)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(fox, have big ears)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(arctic fox, has physical part legs)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(arctic fox, has physical part tail)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(mammal, has physical part tails)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(fox, has physical part tail)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(fox, has physical part tails)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part tails)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part whiskers)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(red panda, has physical part whiskers)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(red panda, have big ears)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(red panda, has physical part tails)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(red squirrel, has physical part tails)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(red fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(arctic fox, has physical part ears)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(red fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(fox, has physical part ears)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(red fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(arctic fox, has physical part noses)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(red fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(arctic fox, has physical part tail)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(red fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(red fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(arctic fox, has physical part legs)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(red fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(mammal, has physical part tails)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(red fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(fox, has physical part tail)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(red fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(fox, have big ears)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(red fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(fox, has physical part tails)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(red fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part tails)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(red fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part whiskers)