red fox: has physical part noses

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fox
Weight: 0.75
, animal
Weight: 0.72
, arctic fox
Weight: 0.71
, species
Weight: 0.69
, mammal
Weight: 0.67
Siblings red squirrel
Weight: 0.40
, gray fox
Weight: 0.39
, red panda
Weight: 0.38
, brown bear
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part noses 1.00
have long noses 0.92
have long pointed noses 0.84
have pointed noses 0.84
has physical part ears 0.84
has physical part teeth 0.82
has physical part tails 0.81
has physical part legs 0.80
has physical part claws 0.79
has physical part tail 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part noses)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part noses)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part noses)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(fox, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part noses)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(mammal, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part noses)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part noses)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(fox, has physical part tail)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part noses)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part legs)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part noses)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part noses)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part noses)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part tail)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part noses)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(red fox, has physical part noses)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part noses)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(red fox, has physical part noses)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part ears)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(red fox, has physical part noses)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part tail)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(red fox, has physical part noses)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(red fox, has physical part noses)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(fox, has physical part ears)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(red fox, has physical part noses)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part legs)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(red fox, has physical part noses)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(mammal, has physical part tails)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(red fox, has physical part noses)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(fox, has physical part tail)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(red fox, has physical part noses)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(fox, has physical part tails)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(red fox, has physical part noses)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, has physical part tails)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.53
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part noses)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part noses)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part noses)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part ears)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part noses)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(fox, has physical part ears)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part noses)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part noses)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part tail)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part noses)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(fox, has physical part tails)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part noses)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part legs)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part noses)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(fox, has physical part tail)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part noses)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(mammal, has physical part tails)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part noses)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, has physical part tails)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part noses)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(red panda, has physical part tails)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part noses)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(red squirrel, has physical part tails)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part noses)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part noses)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part noses)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part noses)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part noses)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(fox, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part noses)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part noses)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part noses)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part noses)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(mammal, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part noses)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part noses)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part noses)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part noses)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part noses)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part noses)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part legs)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part noses)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part noses)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(fox, has physical part tail)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part noses)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part noses)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part tail)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part noses)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part noses)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(red fox, has physical part noses)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(red panda, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(red panda, has physical part tails)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(red fox, has physical part noses)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(red squirrel, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(red squirrel, has physical part tails)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(red fox, has physical part noses)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(red fox, has physical part noses)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(red fox, has physical part noses)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part ears)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(red fox, has physical part noses)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(red fox, has physical part ears)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part noses)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part ears)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(red fox, has physical part noses)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(red fox, have pointed noses)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(red fox, has physical part noses)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(red fox, have long noses)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(red fox, has physical part noses)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part teeth)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(red fox, has physical part noses)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part ears)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(red fox, has physical part noses)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(red fox, has physical part teeth)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(red fox, has physical part noses)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(red fox, have long noses)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(red fox, has physical part noses)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(red fox, have pointed noses)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part noses)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part teeth)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(red fox, has physical part noses)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(red fox, have long pointed noses)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(red fox, has physical part noses)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(red fox, have long noses)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(red fox, has physical part noses)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part teeth)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(red fox, has physical part noses)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(red fox, has physical part claws)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(red fox, has physical part noses)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part claws)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(red fox, has physical part noses)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(red fox, have pointed noses)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(red fox, has physical part noses)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part claws)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(red fox, has physical part noses)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part legs)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part noses)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part tails)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(red fox, has physical part noses)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(red fox, have long pointed noses)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(red fox, has physical part noses)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part legs)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part noses)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part claws)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(red fox, has physical part noses)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(red fox, has physical part legs)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(red fox, has physical part noses)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(red fox, have long pointed noses)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(red fox, has physical part noses)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part tail)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(red fox, has physical part noses)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(red fox, has physical part tails)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part noses)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part legs)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(red fox, has physical part noses)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part tail)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part noses)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have long noses)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(red fox, has physical part noses)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part tails)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part noses)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part tail)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(red fox, has physical part noses)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(red fox, has physical part tail)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(red fox, has physical part noses)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part tails)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part noses)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have pointed noses)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part noses)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have long pointed noses)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(red fox, has physical part noses)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part noses)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part noses)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(red fox, has physical part noses)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part noses)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part noses)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(arctic fox, has physical part noses)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part noses)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(arctic fox, has physical part ears)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part noses)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(arctic fox, has physical part tail)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part noses)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(fox, has physical part ears)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part noses)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part noses)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(mammal, has physical part tails)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part noses)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(arctic fox, has physical part legs)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part noses)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(fox, has physical part tail)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part noses)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(fox, has physical part tails)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part noses)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part tails)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part noses)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(red panda, has physical part tails)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part noses)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(red squirrel, has physical part tails)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(red fox, has physical part noses)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(arctic fox, has physical part noses)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(red fox, has physical part noses)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(arctic fox, has physical part ears)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(red fox, has physical part noses)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(arctic fox, has physical part tail)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(red fox, has physical part noses)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(red fox, has physical part noses)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(fox, has physical part ears)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(red fox, has physical part noses)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(arctic fox, has physical part legs)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(red fox, has physical part noses)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(mammal, has physical part tails)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(red fox, has physical part noses)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(fox, has physical part tail)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(red fox, has physical part noses)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(fox, has physical part tails)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(red fox, has physical part noses)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part tails)